Comparison Overview

Oracle University

VS

Iron Mountain

Oracle University

2300 Oracle Way, Austin, 78741, US
Last Update: 2025-12-22

Upskill and enhance your Oracle proficiency, get Oracle certified to increase your employability and accelerate Oracle SaaS adoption with Oracle University learning content and adoption platforms. Follow us to: ✅ Be the first to hear about discounts in learning paths and certification ✅ Join the discussion on the latest trends in digital adoption and training ✅ Learn about new digital learning opportunities for Oracle solutions ✅ Get access to free Oracle learning resources

NAICS: 5415
NAICS Definition: Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees: None
Subsidiaries: 31
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
9
Attack type number
4

Iron Mountain

1 Federal Street, Boston, Massachusetts, 02110, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

For over 70 years, Iron Mountain Incorporated (NYSE: IRM) has been your strategic partner to care for your information and assets. A global leader in storage and information management services and trusted by more than 225,000 organizations around the world, including 95% of the Fortune 1000, we protect, unlock, and extend the value of your work—whatever it is, wherever it is, however it’s stored. We create the framework necessary to bridge the gaps between paper, digital, media, and physical data and extract value along its lifecycle, helping to build your organizational resilience. And all this with a commitment to sustainability at our core. Our relationship is a true partnership where you trust us not only to preserve institutional knowledge and enhance efficiency, security, and access but to make your work mean more. Because in that work is the power to not only accelerate your business, but elevate it. Elevate the power of your work.

NAICS: 5415
NAICS Definition: Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees: 19,962
Subsidiaries: 4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/oracle-university.jpeg
Oracle University
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/iron-mountain.jpeg
Iron Mountain
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Oracle University
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Iron Mountain
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Average (This Year)

Oracle University has 33.33% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Iron Mountain in 2025.

Incident History — Oracle University (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Oracle University cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Iron Mountain (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Iron Mountain cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/oracle-university.jpeg
Oracle University
Incidents

Date Detected: 11/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Phishing, Software Vulnerability Exploitation
Motivation: Financial Gain, Espionage
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 11/2025
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Exploitation of software vulnerability
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 11/2025
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Exploitation of zero-day vulnerability (CVE-2025-61882)
Motivation: Extortion, Data Theft
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/iron-mountain.jpeg
Iron Mountain
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Iron Mountain company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Oracle University company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Oracle University company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Iron Mountain company has not reported any.

In the current year, Oracle University company has reported more cyber incidents than Iron Mountain company.

Oracle University company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Iron Mountain company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Oracle University company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Iron Mountain company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Oracle University company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Iron Mountain company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Oracle University company has disclosed at least one vulnerability, while Iron Mountain company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Oracle University nor Iron Mountain holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Oracle University company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Iron Mountain company.

Neither Oracle University nor Iron Mountain holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Oracle University nor Iron Mountain holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Oracle University nor Iron Mountain holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Oracle University nor Iron Mountain holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Oracle University nor Iron Mountain holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Oracle University nor Iron Mountain holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Marshmallow is a lightweight library for converting complex objects to and from simple Python datatypes. In versions from 3.0.0rc1 to before 3.26.2 and from 4.0.0 to before 4.1.2, Schema.load(data, many=True) is vulnerable to denial of service attacks. A moderately sized request can consume a disproportionate amount of CPU time. This issue has been patched in version 3.26.2 and 4.1.2.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description

KEDA is a Kubernetes-based Event Driven Autoscaling component. Prior to versions 2.17.3 and 2.18.3, an Arbitrary File Read vulnerability has been identified in KEDA, potentially affecting any KEDA resource that uses TriggerAuthentication to configure HashiCorp Vault authentication. The vulnerability stems from an incorrect or insufficient path validation when loading the Service Account Token specified in spec.hashiCorpVault.credential.serviceAccount. An attacker with permissions to create or modify a TriggerAuthentication resource can exfiltrate the content of any file from the node's filesystem (where the KEDA pod resides) by directing the file's content to a server under their control, as part of the Vault authentication request. The potential impact includes the exfiltration of sensitive system information, such as secrets, keys, or the content of files like /etc/passwd. This issue has been patched in versions 2.17.3 and 2.18.3.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Fedify is a TypeScript library for building federated server apps powered by ActivityPub. Prior to versions 1.6.13, 1.7.14, 1.8.15, and 1.9.2, a Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS) vulnerability exists in Fedify's document loader. The HTML parsing regex at packages/fedify/src/runtime/docloader.ts:259 contains nested quantifiers that cause catastrophic backtracking when processing maliciously crafted HTML responses. This issue has been patched in versions 1.6.13, 1.7.14, 1.8.15, and 1.9.2.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Authenticated Remote Code Execution (RCE) in PluXml CMS 5.8.22 allows an attacker with administrator panel access to inject a malicious PHP webshell into a theme file (e.g., home.php).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

An issue was discovered in Xiongmai XM530 IP cameras on firmware V5.00.R02.000807D8.10010.346624.S.ONVIF 21.06. The GetStreamUri exposes RTSP URIs containing hardcoded credentials enabling direct unauthorized video stream access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N