Comparison Overview

Options Recovery Services

VS

Family Recovery Services

Options Recovery Services

1835 Allston Way, Berkeley, CA, 94703, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.optionsrecovery.org

Options Recovery Services is a small non-profit substance abuse recovery center. Based in Berkeley, CA Options maintains a cutting edge out-patient treatment program which includes an integrated mental health clinic as well as their own toxicology lab on-site. Treatment includes acupuncture, Tai chi, and meditation within the curriculum. They also have 6 transitional houses providing low cost shelter for nearly 100 men and women. Options'​ mission is to provide treatment to anyone who walks in the door regardless of their ability to pay for service.

NAICS: 621
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 108
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Family Recovery Services

104 Erin Court, Hillsboro, OH, 45133, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799
http://www.FamilyRecoveryServices.org

Family Recovery Services opened their doors to serve Southern Ohio in 1983. Both FRS Counseling and FRS Transportation are part of the Family Recovery Services Agency. FRS Counseling is an outpatient counseling center for the residents of Southern Ohio with offices located in Highland and Adams County. As a CARF accredited site we provide services for Substance Abuse Prevention, Outpatient Substance Abuse Treatment, Intensive Outpatient Substance Abuse Treatment, Medication Assisted Treatment, Outpatient Mental Health Services, Partial Hospitalization Services for Children and Adolescents, and Psychiatric Services. FRS Transportation provides transportation for Highland and Adams County residents to medical/counseling appointments and job/educational training in Highland/Adams Counties and the surrounding areas of Cincinnati, Dayton, Columbus, Chillicothe and Portsmouth.

NAICS: 621
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 21
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/options-recovery-services.jpeg
Options Recovery Services
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/family-recovery-services.jpeg
Family Recovery Services
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Options Recovery Services
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Family Recovery Services
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Options Recovery Services in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Family Recovery Services in 2026.

Incident History — Options Recovery Services (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Options Recovery Services cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Family Recovery Services (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Family Recovery Services cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/options-recovery-services.jpeg
Options Recovery Services
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/family-recovery-services.jpeg
Family Recovery Services
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Family Recovery Services company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Options Recovery Services company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Family Recovery Services company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Options Recovery Services company.

In the current year, Family Recovery Services company and Options Recovery Services company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Family Recovery Services company nor Options Recovery Services company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Family Recovery Services company nor Options Recovery Services company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Family Recovery Services company nor Options Recovery Services company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Options Recovery Services company nor Family Recovery Services company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Options Recovery Services nor Family Recovery Services holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Options Recovery Services company nor Family Recovery Services company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Options Recovery Services company employs more people globally than Family Recovery Services company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither Options Recovery Services nor Family Recovery Services holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Options Recovery Services nor Family Recovery Services holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Options Recovery Services nor Family Recovery Services holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Options Recovery Services nor Family Recovery Services holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Options Recovery Services nor Family Recovery Services holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Options Recovery Services nor Family Recovery Services holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References