Comparison Overview

OpsPanda

VS

GlobalLogic

OpsPanda

525 Lytton Ave Palo Alto, CA 94301, US
Last Update: 2025-03-15 (UTC)
Between 900 and 1000

Excellent

OpsPanda joins Xactly. Xactly will now offer customers a data-driven, prepackaged and integrated sales planning solution that covers territory design and quota allocation, as well as workforce and capacity management. https://www.xactlycorp.com/press-releases/xactly-acquires-sales-resource-capacity-planning-provider-opspanda/

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 11-50
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

GlobalLogic

2535 Augustine Drive, Santa Clara, CA, 95054, US
Last Update: 2025-05-06 (UTC)

Strong

Between 800 and 900

GlobalLogic, a Hitachi Group Company, is a full-lifecycle product development services leader that combines chip-to-cloud software engineering expertise and vertical industry experience to help our customers design, build, and deliver their next generation products and digital experiences. We expertly integrate design, complex engineering, and agile delivery capabilities to produce superior business outcomes for global brands. Headquartered in Silicon Valley, GlobalLogic operates design studios and engineering centers around the world, extending the benefits of our true global presence to customers in the telecom, automotive, healthcare, technology, media and entertainment, manufacturing, and semiconductor industries.

NAICS: 5112
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 33,185
Subsidiaries: 10
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/opspanda.jpeg
OpsPanda
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/globallogic.jpeg
GlobalLogic
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
Compliance Summary
OpsPanda
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
GlobalLogic
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for OpsPanda in 2025.

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for GlobalLogic in 2025.

Incident History โ€” OpsPanda (X = Date, Y = Severity)

OpsPanda cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History โ€” GlobalLogic (X = Date, Y = Severity)

GlobalLogic cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/opspanda.jpeg
OpsPanda
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/globallogic.jpeg
GlobalLogic
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

OpsPanda company company demonstrates a stronger AI risk posture compared to GlobalLogic company company, reflecting its advanced AI governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, GlobalLogic company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to OpsPanda company.

In the current year, GlobalLogic company and OpsPanda company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither GlobalLogic company nor OpsPanda company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither GlobalLogic company nor OpsPanda company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither GlobalLogic company nor OpsPanda company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither OpsPanda company nor GlobalLogic company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

GlobalLogic company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to OpsPanda company.

GlobalLogic company employs more people globally than OpsPanda company, reflecting its scale as a Software Development.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper Protection Against Voltage and Clock Glitches in FPGA devices, could allow an attacker with physical access to undervolt the platform resulting in a loss of confidentiality.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Malicious code was inserted into the Nx (build system) package and several related plugins. The tampered package was published to the npm software registry, via a supply-chain attack. Affected versions contain code that scans the file system, collects credentials, and posts them to GitHub as a repo under user's accounts.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Flag Forge is a Capture The Flag (CTF) platform. In versions from 2.1.0 to before 2.3.0, the API endpoint GET /api/problems/:id returns challenge hints in plaintext within the question object, regardless of whether the user has unlocked them via point deduction. Users can view all hints for free, undermining the business logic of the platform and reducing the integrity of the challenge system. This issue has been patched in version 2.3.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Flag Forge is a Capture The Flag (CTF) platform. In version 2.1.0, the /api/admin/assign-badge endpoint lacks proper access control, allowing any authenticated user to assign high-privilege badges (e.g., Staff) to themselves. This could lead to privilege escalation and impersonation of administrative roles. This issue has been patched in version 2.2.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:N
Description

parse is a package designed to parse JavaScript SDK. A Prototype Pollution vulnerability in the SingleInstanceStateController.initializeState function of parse version 5.3.0 and before allows attackers to inject properties on Object.prototype via supplying a crafted payload, causing denial of service (DoS) as the minimum consequence.