Comparison Overview

OPPO

VS

AT&T

OPPO

China Resources Tower, Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN, 518000
Last Update: 2025-12-09
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.oppo.com/en

Founded in 2004, OPPO is one of the world's leading innovators of smart devices. With operations in over 60 countries and regions, OPPO's more than 290,000 points of sales and 1,900 official service centers share the beauty of technology with users all over the world. To forward our vision of a better future, OPPO has established ten smart manufacturing facilities around the world, as well as a global design center in London. Every day, our 40,000 employees put their heart and soul into exploring the possibilities of humanistic technology. OPPO is not just a device maker. We are a technology company that combines hardware with software and services. Our software range, built around the ColorOS operating system, makes devices more user-friendly and intelligent for our 500 million users worldwide. The OPPO App Market, OPPO Cloud also deliver smarter, more convenient, and better-connected services. Moving forward, OPPO will remain committed to our mission of "Technology for Mankind, Kindness for the World." We will continue to pursue innovation in the smart themes of learning, productivity, entertainment, and healthcare to meet the needs of people around the world. Constantly seeking technological breakthroughs. Make your moment with OPPO.

NAICS: 517
NAICS Definition: Telecommunications
Employees: 52,214
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
View Profile

AT&T

208 S. Akard Street, None, Dallas, TX, US, 75202
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 0 and 549
http://www.att.com

We understand that our customers want an easier, less complicated life. We’re using our network, labs, products, services, and people to create a world where everything works together seamlessly, and life is better as a result. How will we continue to drive for this excellence in innovation? With you. Our people, and their passion to succeed, are at the heart of what we do. Today, we’re poised to connect millions of people with their world, delivering the human benefits of technology in ways that defy the imaginable. What are you dreaming of doing with your career? Find stories about our talent, career advice, opportunities, company news, and innovations here on LinkedIn. To learn more about joining AT&T, visit: http://www.att.jobs We provide in some of our posts links to articles or posts from third-party websites unaffiliated with AT&T. In doing so, AT&T is not adopting, endorsing or otherwise approving the content of those articles or posts. AT&T is providing this content for your information only.

NAICS: 517
NAICS Definition: Telecommunications
Employees: 177,538
Subsidiaries: 7
12-month incidents
4
Known data breaches
19
Attack type number
3

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/oppo.jpeg
OPPO
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/att.jpeg
AT&T
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
OPPO
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
AT&T
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Average (This Year)

OPPO has 31.58% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Average (This Year)

AT&T has 426.32% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incident History — OPPO (X = Date, Y = Severity)

OPPO cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — AT&T (X = Date, Y = Severity)

AT&T cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/oppo.jpeg
OPPO
Incidents

Date Detected: 6/2025
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Adjacent network access
Motivation: Unauthorized information disclosure
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/att.jpeg
AT&T
Incidents

Date Detected: 12/2025
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 11/2025
Type:Breach
Motivation: Financial Gain, Data Theft
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 5/2025
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

FAQ

OPPO company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to AT&T company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

AT&T company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to OPPO company.

In the current year, AT&T company has reported more cyber incidents than OPPO company.

AT&T company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while OPPO company has not reported such incidents publicly.

AT&T company has disclosed at least one data breach, while OPPO company has not reported such incidents publicly.

AT&T company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while OPPO company has not reported such incidents publicly.

OPPO company has disclosed at least one vulnerability, while AT&T company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither OPPO nor AT&T holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

AT&T company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to OPPO company.

AT&T company employs more people globally than OPPO company, reflecting its scale as a Telecommunications.

Neither OPPO nor AT&T holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither OPPO nor AT&T holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither OPPO nor AT&T holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither OPPO nor AT&T holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither OPPO nor AT&T holds HIPAA certification.

Neither OPPO nor AT&T holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References