Comparison Overview

OPmobility

VS

Rivian

OPmobility

None
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799

OPmobility is a world leader in sustainable mobility and a technology partner to mobility players worldwide. Driven by innovation since its creation in 1946, the Group is today composed of five complementary business groups that enable it to offer its customers a wide range of solutions: intelligent exterior systems, complex modules, lighting systems, energy storage systems and battery and hydrogen electrification solutions. OPmobility also offers its customers an activity dedicated to the development of software, OPn'Soft. SOME NUMBERS IN 2024 📍Economic revenue: €11.6bn (+2.8% vs. 2023) 📍Operating margin: €440m (+11.4% vs. 2023) 📍Sustainability : 🔹Improvement of energy efficiency by 22.0% in 2024 vs. 2019 (excluding Lighting) 🔹35 sites equipped with solar panels and wind turbine (+12 in 2024) 🔹OPmobility awarded an “A” rating by CDP for second year in a row

NAICS: 3361
NAICS Definition: Motor Vehicle Manufacturing
Employees: 10,001
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Rivian

14600 Myford Rd, Irvine, 92606, US
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799

Doing something different is never easy. It requires courage, optimism and grit. Core to our mission is building a team of adventurous individuals determined to make a positive impact on the world. This means challenging ourselves constantly. Stretching beyond the bounds of conventional thinking. Reframing old problems. Seeking new solutions. And operating comfortably in a space of uncertainty. While our backgrounds are diverse, our team shares a love of the outdoors and a desire to protect it for future generations. Do you like doing the impossible? We’d love to hear from you.

NAICS: 3361
NAICS Definition: Motor Vehicle Manufacturing
Employees: 11,844
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/opmobility.jpeg
OPmobility
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rivian.jpeg
Rivian
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
OPmobility
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Rivian
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Motor Vehicle Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for OPmobility in 2025.

Incidents vs Motor Vehicle Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Rivian in 2025.

Incident History — OPmobility (X = Date, Y = Severity)

OPmobility cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Rivian (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Rivian cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/opmobility.jpeg
OPmobility
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rivian.jpeg
Rivian
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Rivian company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to OPmobility company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Rivian company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to OPmobility company.

In the current year, Rivian company and OPmobility company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Rivian company nor OPmobility company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Rivian company nor OPmobility company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Rivian company nor OPmobility company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither OPmobility company nor Rivian company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither OPmobility nor Rivian holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither OPmobility company nor Rivian company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Rivian company employs more people globally than OPmobility company, reflecting its scale as a Motor Vehicle Manufacturing.

Neither OPmobility nor Rivian holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither OPmobility nor Rivian holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither OPmobility nor Rivian holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither OPmobility nor Rivian holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither OPmobility nor Rivian holds HIPAA certification.

Neither OPmobility nor Rivian holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N