Comparison Overview

Opera Omaha

VS

OPERA America

Opera Omaha

1850 Farnam St, Omaha, Nebraska, 68102, US
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799

Opera Omaha is a growth-minded, high energy, and innovative company with a demanding mission: producing opera performances in multiple formats and styles and co-creating artist-led programs for a variety of community service organizations. We believe the power of opera is transformational, and as a result supports the creation of an inventive, creative, empathetic, and inclusive community that inspires joy, self-discovery, kinder discourse, and opportunity for all.

NAICS: 711
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 42
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

OPERA America

330 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY, 10001, US
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799

OPERA America leads and serves the entire opera community, supporting the creation, presentation, and enjoyment of opera. Founded in 1970, OPERA America has a membership that includes over 600 opera companies, educational institutions, affiliated businesses, and other entities. More than 40,000 staff members, artists, and trustees at these organizations join nearly 3,000 individual members in empowering us as the national champion for opera. Through national convenings, research, advocacy, granting, thought leadership, and a variety of programs for artists, administrators, educators, trustees, and appreciators, we move opera forward as an industry and an art form. The quarterly Opera America Magazine highlights the progress of the sector and the impact of more than $15 million in strategic grants we have awarded to increase new work, audience engagement, civic practice, business innovation, and inclusivity. The National Opera Center, our custom-built rehearsal and performance facility in New York City, serves as the centralized home for the industry, welcoming 80,000 visitors each year.

NAICS: 711
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 96
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/opera-omaha.jpeg
Opera Omaha
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/opera-america.jpeg
OPERA America
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Opera Omaha
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
OPERA America
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Performing Arts Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Opera Omaha in 2025.

Incidents vs Performing Arts Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for OPERA America in 2025.

Incident History — Opera Omaha (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Opera Omaha cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — OPERA America (X = Date, Y = Severity)

OPERA America cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/opera-omaha.jpeg
Opera Omaha
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/opera-america.jpeg
OPERA America
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Opera Omaha company and OPERA America company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, OPERA America company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Opera Omaha company.

In the current year, OPERA America company and Opera Omaha company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither OPERA America company nor Opera Omaha company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither OPERA America company nor Opera Omaha company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither OPERA America company nor Opera Omaha company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Opera Omaha company nor OPERA America company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Opera Omaha nor OPERA America holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Opera Omaha company nor OPERA America company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

OPERA America company employs more people globally than Opera Omaha company, reflecting its scale as a Performing Arts.

Neither Opera Omaha nor OPERA America holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Opera Omaha nor OPERA America holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Opera Omaha nor OPERA America holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Opera Omaha nor OPERA America holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Opera Omaha nor OPERA America holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Opera Omaha nor OPERA America holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N