Comparison Overview

Openly Disruptive

VS

Mulholland Institute

Openly Disruptive

undefined, St. Louis, MO, undefined, US
Last Update: 2025-12-01

Openly Disruptive is a public think tank. We engage the people creating tomorrow with public events, innovative content, open innovation platforms and private consulting. We believe solutions to our biggest challenges and opportunities come from collaboration around open technology, lean and agile commerce, and collaborative culture. Everyone's a stakeholder in our future, let's work together. The future will be what we make it!

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Mulholland Institute

23679 Calabasas Rd. #507, Calabasas, CA, 91402, US
Last Update: 2025-12-02

Public Policy, Research and Facilitation - Proactive Planning and Visioning, Town Centers and Public Spaces, Livable and Sustainable Communities, Transportation and Mobility, Industry Clusters and Economic Development, Demographics, Research, Outreach and Communications, Publications, Messaging and Media, Public Policy, P3 Partnerships, Civic Development, Regional Events and Conferences, Government Relations Visit us at http://www.mulhollandinstitute.org to see our library of projects, statistics and other information.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/openly-disruptive.jpeg
Openly Disruptive
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mulholland-institute.jpeg
Mulholland Institute
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Openly Disruptive
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Mulholland Institute
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Openly Disruptive in 2025.

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Mulholland Institute in 2025.

Incident History — Openly Disruptive (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Openly Disruptive cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Mulholland Institute (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Mulholland Institute cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/openly-disruptive.jpeg
Openly Disruptive
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mulholland-institute.jpeg
Mulholland Institute
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Mulholland Institute company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Openly Disruptive company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Mulholland Institute company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Openly Disruptive company.

In the current year, Mulholland Institute company and Openly Disruptive company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Mulholland Institute company nor Openly Disruptive company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Mulholland Institute company nor Openly Disruptive company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Mulholland Institute company nor Openly Disruptive company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Openly Disruptive company nor Mulholland Institute company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Openly Disruptive nor Mulholland Institute holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Openly Disruptive company nor Mulholland Institute company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Mulholland Institute company employs more people globally than Openly Disruptive company, reflecting its scale as a Think Tanks.

Neither Openly Disruptive nor Mulholland Institute holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Openly Disruptive nor Mulholland Institute holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Openly Disruptive nor Mulholland Institute holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Openly Disruptive nor Mulholland Institute holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Openly Disruptive nor Mulholland Institute holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Openly Disruptive nor Mulholland Institute holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Sigstore Timestamp Authority is a service for issuing RFC 3161 timestamps. Prior to 2.0.3, Function api.ParseJSONRequest currently splits (via a call to strings.Split) an optionally-provided OID (which is untrusted data) on periods. Similarly, function api.getContentType splits the Content-Type header (which is also untrusted data) on an application string. As a result, in the face of a malicious request with either an excessively long OID in the payload containing many period characters or a malformed Content-Type header, a call to api.ParseJSONRequest or api.getContentType incurs allocations of O(n) bytes (where n stands for the length of the function's argument). This vulnerability is fixed in 2.0.3.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Monkeytype is a minimalistic and customizable typing test. In 25.49.0 and earlier, there is improper handling of user input which allows an attacker to execute malicious javascript on anyone viewing a malicious quote submission. quote.text and quote.source are user input, and they're inserted straight into the DOM. If they contain HTML tags, they will be rendered (after some escaping using quotes and textarea tags).

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

SysReptor is a fully customizable pentest reporting platform. Prior to 2025.102, there is a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability allows authenticated users to execute malicious JavaScript in the context of other logged-in users by uploading malicious JavaScript files in the web UI. This vulnerability is fixed in 2025.102.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Taiko Alethia is an Ethereum-equivalent, permissionless, based rollup designed to scale Ethereum without compromising its fundamental properties. In 2.3.1 and earlier, TaikoInbox._verifyBatches (packages/protocol/contracts/layer1/based/TaikoInbox.sol:627-678) advanced the local tid to whatever transition matched the current blockHash before knowing whether that batch would actually be verified. When the loop later broke (e.g., cooldown window not yet passed or transition invalidated), the function still wrote that newer tid into batches[lastVerifiedBatchId].verifiedTransitionId after decrementing batchId. Result: the last verified batch could end up pointing at a transition index from the next batch (often zeroed), corrupting the verified chain pointer.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A flaw has been found in youlaitech youlai-mall 1.0.0/2.0.0. Affected is the function getById/updateAddress/deleteAddress of the file /mall-ums/app-api/v1/addresses/. Executing manipulation can lead to improper control of dynamically-identified variables. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit has been published and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X