Comparison Overview

OCEG

VS

Lotus Project

OCEG

4144 N. 44th Street, Phoenix, AZ, 85018, US
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799

OCEG, a global nonprofit think tank, pioneered GRC and Principled Performance®. For over twenty years, OCEG has democratized GRC knowledge, offering open-access frameworks, resources, education, and certifications to professionals worldwide. Through the OCEG GRC Capability Model™ and Principled Performance®, OCEG drives leadership and strategy. OCEG's 150K+ members include individuals at all levels, from C-suite to individual contributors across small and midsize businesses, international corporations, nonprofits, and government agencies. OCEG aims to establish democratized GRC knowledge as the global standard by offering open-source frameworks and affordable, accredited education. OCEG educates its members on achieving Principled Performance through integrated capability models across six critical disciplines: Governance and oversight, Strategy and performance, Risk and decision Support, Compliance and ethics, Security and continuity, and Audit and assurance.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 41
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Lotus Project

Quay Street, London, England, E1 6AN, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 700 and 749

The Lotus Project is a charitable organization operating in fast growing economies created to alleviate poverty and set the foundation of sustainable economic development in rural areas. The aim is to promote renewable energy usage and education within ethnic minority groups, while alleviating poverty by creating jobs, in the more remote unattended regions. Mission statement: Alleviate poverty and increase economic productivity in developing economies through the implementation of independent off-grid renewable energy projects and a rural development model (RDM). Dự án Lotus là một tổ chức từ thiện hoạt động tại Việt Nam nhằm góp phần xóa đói giảm nghèo và tạo tiền đề phát triển kinh tế tại những khu vực hẻo lánh. Cụ thể, dự án giúp thúc đẩy việc sử dụng năng lượng tái tạo và giáo dục trong cộng đồng các dân tộc thiểu số, đồng thời giảm nghèo đói bằng việc tạo công ăn việc làm tại những vùng sâu vùng xa. Nhiệm vụ: Xóa đói giảm nghèo và tăng cường hiệu quả kinh tế tại những vùng hẻo lánh thuộc khu vực Tây Bắc, Việt Nam thông qua các dự án lắp đặt hệ thống năng lượng tái tạo độc lập. The Lotus Project is registered in England and Wales as a charitable company limited by guarantee (number: 1181885).

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 11
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/open-compliance-&-ethics-group-oceg-.jpeg
OCEG
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lotusproject.jpeg
Lotus Project
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
OCEG
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Lotus Project
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for OCEG in 2025.

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Lotus Project in 2025.

Incident History — OCEG (X = Date, Y = Severity)

OCEG cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Lotus Project (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Lotus Project cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/open-compliance-&-ethics-group-oceg-.jpeg
OCEG
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lotusproject.jpeg
Lotus Project
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

OCEG company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Lotus Project company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Lotus Project company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to OCEG company.

In the current year, Lotus Project company and OCEG company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Lotus Project company nor OCEG company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Lotus Project company nor OCEG company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Lotus Project company nor OCEG company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither OCEG company nor Lotus Project company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither OCEG nor Lotus Project holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

OCEG company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Lotus Project company.

OCEG company employs more people globally than Lotus Project company, reflecting its scale as a Think Tanks.

Neither OCEG nor Lotus Project holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither OCEG nor Lotus Project holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither OCEG nor Lotus Project holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither OCEG nor Lotus Project holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither OCEG nor Lotus Project holds HIPAA certification.

Neither OCEG nor Lotus Project holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Sigstore Timestamp Authority is a service for issuing RFC 3161 timestamps. Prior to 2.0.3, Function api.ParseJSONRequest currently splits (via a call to strings.Split) an optionally-provided OID (which is untrusted data) on periods. Similarly, function api.getContentType splits the Content-Type header (which is also untrusted data) on an application string. As a result, in the face of a malicious request with either an excessively long OID in the payload containing many period characters or a malformed Content-Type header, a call to api.ParseJSONRequest or api.getContentType incurs allocations of O(n) bytes (where n stands for the length of the function's argument). This vulnerability is fixed in 2.0.3.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Monkeytype is a minimalistic and customizable typing test. In 25.49.0 and earlier, there is improper handling of user input which allows an attacker to execute malicious javascript on anyone viewing a malicious quote submission. quote.text and quote.source are user input, and they're inserted straight into the DOM. If they contain HTML tags, they will be rendered (after some escaping using quotes and textarea tags).

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

SysReptor is a fully customizable pentest reporting platform. Prior to 2025.102, there is a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability allows authenticated users to execute malicious JavaScript in the context of other logged-in users by uploading malicious JavaScript files in the web UI. This vulnerability is fixed in 2025.102.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Taiko Alethia is an Ethereum-equivalent, permissionless, based rollup designed to scale Ethereum without compromising its fundamental properties. In 2.3.1 and earlier, TaikoInbox._verifyBatches (packages/protocol/contracts/layer1/based/TaikoInbox.sol:627-678) advanced the local tid to whatever transition matched the current blockHash before knowing whether that batch would actually be verified. When the loop later broke (e.g., cooldown window not yet passed or transition invalidated), the function still wrote that newer tid into batches[lastVerifiedBatchId].verifiedTransitionId after decrementing batchId. Result: the last verified batch could end up pointing at a transition index from the next batch (often zeroed), corrupting the verified chain pointer.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A flaw has been found in youlaitech youlai-mall 1.0.0/2.0.0. Affected is the function getById/updateAddress/deleteAddress of the file /mall-ums/app-api/v1/addresses/. Executing manipulation can lead to improper control of dynamically-identified variables. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit has been published and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X