Comparison Overview

Opal Print

VS

The Dingley Press

Opal Print

Unit 22 Third Avenue, Westfield Trading Estate, Midsomer Norton, Bath, Somerset, GB, BA3 4XD
Last Update: 2025-12-17
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.opalprint.co.uk

If you would like to work with a Carbon Balanced Printer then please contact Opal Print. Established in 1987, Opal celebrates 37 years of successful business in 2024. Providing a range of printing and finishing services, we are renowned for our friendly, reliable service within the B2B, corporate and creative print industry. Opal is a team of approachable, knowledgeable people, confident in their understanding of creative ideas, printing techniques and the pressure of deadlines. Whether a straightforward specification or one that is complex and technical, we are passionate about creating beautiful work. The Opal ethos is very much one of attention to detail, with a genuine interest in our clients, their business and their print expectations. Our service and our work is exceptional - both are achieved by the Opal team listening to and understanding our clients' requirements, and our clients' having trust in our abilities and experience. Situated just south of Bath & Bristol, we serve regional and national clients with lithographic, digital and wide format print. To sum up, we are enthusiastic about what we do and we love print!

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 8
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

The Dingley Press

119 Lisbon Street, Lisbon, ME, 04250, US
Last Update: 2025-12-12
Between 750 and 799
https://dingley.com/

Our customers enjoy and value our high quality catalog printing, binding, co-mailing, and distribution capabilities, and a superior level of customer service they simply cannot find elsewhere. Importantly, our customers find in working with us, a responsiveness and flexibility of a much smaller company, with the resources and capabilities of a much larger one – an important distinction in this period of shrinking choices among catalog printers! As a full-service catalog printer, we offer our customers considerable paper and postage savings with our unique RIGHTSIZE press format of 10-1/8”, advanced co-mailing and distribution capabilities, outstanding manufacturing reliability and a commitment to customer service unmatched in the industry.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 154
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/opal-print.jpeg
Opal Print
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-dingley-press.jpeg
The Dingley Press
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Opal Print
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
The Dingley Press
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Opal Print in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Dingley Press in 2025.

Incident History — Opal Print (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Opal Print cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — The Dingley Press (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Dingley Press cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/opal-print.jpeg
Opal Print
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-dingley-press.jpeg
The Dingley Press
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

The Dingley Press company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Opal Print company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, The Dingley Press company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Opal Print company.

In the current year, The Dingley Press company and Opal Print company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither The Dingley Press company nor Opal Print company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither The Dingley Press company nor Opal Print company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither The Dingley Press company nor Opal Print company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Opal Print company nor The Dingley Press company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Opal Print nor The Dingley Press holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Opal Print company nor The Dingley Press company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

The Dingley Press company employs more people globally than Opal Print company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Opal Print nor The Dingley Press holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Opal Print nor The Dingley Press holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Opal Print nor The Dingley Press holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Opal Print nor The Dingley Press holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Opal Print nor The Dingley Press holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Opal Print nor The Dingley Press holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References