Comparison Overview

Onward Automation Inc.

VS

ShadComm Ltd

Onward Automation Inc.

4591 County Rd 46, Maidstone, Ontario, N0R 1K0, CA
Last Update: 2025-11-22

Onward Automation Inc. is a provider of not just automation & control systems, but full solutions for your business needs. We listen to you and work with your company to ensure that the solution we provide to you meets all your requirements. Focused on small standalone automation as well as larger robotics cells. We provide industrial automation solutions for all types of industries. You know what your business needs are, and we know how to provide that. Our focus is your solution.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 11
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

ShadComm Ltd

271 Dalton Avenue, Miramichi, E1V 3C4, CA
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

ShadComm Ltd is a leading control systems integrator, for all areas of industry. Originating in 1995, we provided a CCTV service to the pulp and paper industry which proved to help revolutionize the paper industry, by reducing machine down time. Thriving for 21 yrs now, ShadComm Ltd has evolved into one of the premier solution providers for Systems Integration, SCADA, PLC Programming and Control Panel building in Atlantic Canada. At ShadComm Ltd, we are proud to be an innovative leader in industry. Our products continue to be backed by our "customer comes first" service model.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 12
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/onward-control-solution-inc-.jpeg
Onward Automation Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/shadcomm-ltd.jpeg
ShadComm Ltd
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Onward Automation Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
ShadComm Ltd
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Industrial Automation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Onward Automation Inc. in 2025.

Incidents vs Industrial Automation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ShadComm Ltd in 2025.

Incident History — Onward Automation Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Onward Automation Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — ShadComm Ltd (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ShadComm Ltd cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/onward-control-solution-inc-.jpeg
Onward Automation Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/shadcomm-ltd.jpeg
ShadComm Ltd
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

ShadComm Ltd company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Onward Automation Inc. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, ShadComm Ltd company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Onward Automation Inc. company.

In the current year, ShadComm Ltd company and Onward Automation Inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither ShadComm Ltd company nor Onward Automation Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither ShadComm Ltd company nor Onward Automation Inc. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither ShadComm Ltd company nor Onward Automation Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Onward Automation Inc. company nor ShadComm Ltd company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Onward Automation Inc. nor ShadComm Ltd holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Onward Automation Inc. company nor ShadComm Ltd company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

ShadComm Ltd company employs more people globally than Onward Automation Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Industrial Automation.

Neither Onward Automation Inc. nor ShadComm Ltd holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Onward Automation Inc. nor ShadComm Ltd holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Onward Automation Inc. nor ShadComm Ltd holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Onward Automation Inc. nor ShadComm Ltd holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Onward Automation Inc. nor ShadComm Ltd holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Onward Automation Inc. nor ShadComm Ltd holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H