Comparison Overview

Onramp Lab

VS

Nexus Insights

Onramp Lab

3F, No. 400, Sec. 1 Keelung Road , Xinyi District, Taipei City, Taiwan, 110, TW
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799

Onramp Lab was founded by Lawrence Ng in 2015, and currently have more than 70 full-time professionals in our Los Angeles and Taipei offices. We specialize in online-to-offline omnichannel digital marketing. Our capabilities include Performance Marketing, UX/Conversion Rate Optimization, and Monetization Solutions. Onramp Lab 在2015年由饒富經驗的創業家,同時也是天使投資人的Lawrence Ng 吳鎮雄創立。目前擁有70多位員工分布在臺北和美國洛杉磯上海兩個辦公室。其中,座落於臺北信義區總部的團隊擁有多項持續優化全通路行銷的能力以及在營運發展領域的專業,包含:績效型數位行銷(Performancing Marketing)、UX及轉換率優化 (UX/ CRO )以及內部自行開發的廣告投放優化系統(Monetization Solutions)。 Onramp Lab is known for building brands with online-to-offline omnichannel marketing capabilities, especially in paid search, display, native, paid social, SEO, email and affiliate marketing across Google, Yahoo, Bing, Facebook, LinkedIn and more. Onramp professionals drive measurable value to multiple wholly owned and partnered companies through strategic guidance and subsequent execution in performance marketing, UX/CRO, and revenue optimization. Today, the Onramp Lab has organized a talented and strong Tech team to automatize success strategies and insight into software evolving into a technology-driven marketing/sales company. Onramp Lab以線上線下全通路行銷能力打造品牌而知名,尤其在付費搜尋、展示型廣告、原生(業配)廣告、社群媒體推廣、搜尋引擎優化、電子郵件行銷和聯盟行銷方式等領域,並跨足Google, Yahoo, Bing, Facebook, LinkedIn等多平台進行。 Onramp Lab透過在績效型行銷、UX/CRO和營收優化之策略指導以及後續的實際執行,替多個全資擁有或合資品牌創造可觀營收。至今,Onramp Lab組建了強大且才華洋溢的團隊,將各項成功的行銷概念及專業見解開發為程式及軟體,成為科技導向的行銷/銷售公司。

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 54
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Nexus Insights

undefined, Annapolis, MD, undefined, US
Last Update: 2025-12-04

Nexus Insights is a think tank advancing the well-being of older adults through innovative models of housing and healthcare. We are a diverse group of thought leaders and stakeholders in aging and healthcare, who formed in response to the flaws in attitudes and models exposed by the COVID-19 pandemic. Our Nexus Fellows include: Bob Kramer, Ryan Frederick, Sara Zeff Geber, David Grabowski, Jody Holtzman, Jacquelyn, Jay Newton-Small, Caroline Pearson, Dr, Bill Thomas, Sarah Thomas, Anne Tumlinson and Jill Vitale-Aussem.

NAICS: 54172
NAICS Definition: Research and Development in the Social Sciences and Humanities
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/onramp-lab.jpeg
Onramp Lab
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/nexus-insights.jpeg
Nexus Insights
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Onramp Lab
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Nexus Insights
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Onramp Lab in 2025.

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Nexus Insights in 2025.

Incident History — Onramp Lab (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Onramp Lab cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Nexus Insights (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Nexus Insights cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/onramp-lab.jpeg
Onramp Lab
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/nexus-insights.jpeg
Nexus Insights
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Onramp Lab company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Nexus Insights company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Nexus Insights company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Onramp Lab company.

In the current year, Nexus Insights company and Onramp Lab company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Nexus Insights company nor Onramp Lab company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Nexus Insights company nor Onramp Lab company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Nexus Insights company nor Onramp Lab company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Onramp Lab company nor Nexus Insights company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Onramp Lab nor Nexus Insights holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Onramp Lab company nor Nexus Insights company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Onramp Lab company employs more people globally than Nexus Insights company, reflecting its scale as a Think Tanks.

Neither Onramp Lab nor Nexus Insights holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Onramp Lab nor Nexus Insights holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Onramp Lab nor Nexus Insights holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Onramp Lab nor Nexus Insights holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Onramp Lab nor Nexus Insights holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Onramp Lab nor Nexus Insights holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Sigstore Timestamp Authority is a service for issuing RFC 3161 timestamps. Prior to 2.0.3, Function api.ParseJSONRequest currently splits (via a call to strings.Split) an optionally-provided OID (which is untrusted data) on periods. Similarly, function api.getContentType splits the Content-Type header (which is also untrusted data) on an application string. As a result, in the face of a malicious request with either an excessively long OID in the payload containing many period characters or a malformed Content-Type header, a call to api.ParseJSONRequest or api.getContentType incurs allocations of O(n) bytes (where n stands for the length of the function's argument). This vulnerability is fixed in 2.0.3.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Monkeytype is a minimalistic and customizable typing test. In 25.49.0 and earlier, there is improper handling of user input which allows an attacker to execute malicious javascript on anyone viewing a malicious quote submission. quote.text and quote.source are user input, and they're inserted straight into the DOM. If they contain HTML tags, they will be rendered (after some escaping using quotes and textarea tags).

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

SysReptor is a fully customizable pentest reporting platform. Prior to 2025.102, there is a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability allows authenticated users to execute malicious JavaScript in the context of other logged-in users by uploading malicious JavaScript files in the web UI. This vulnerability is fixed in 2025.102.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Taiko Alethia is an Ethereum-equivalent, permissionless, based rollup designed to scale Ethereum without compromising its fundamental properties. In 2.3.1 and earlier, TaikoInbox._verifyBatches (packages/protocol/contracts/layer1/based/TaikoInbox.sol:627-678) advanced the local tid to whatever transition matched the current blockHash before knowing whether that batch would actually be verified. When the loop later broke (e.g., cooldown window not yet passed or transition invalidated), the function still wrote that newer tid into batches[lastVerifiedBatchId].verifiedTransitionId after decrementing batchId. Result: the last verified batch could end up pointing at a transition index from the next batch (often zeroed), corrupting the verified chain pointer.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A flaw has been found in youlaitech youlai-mall 1.0.0/2.0.0. Affected is the function getById/updateAddress/deleteAddress of the file /mall-ums/app-api/v1/addresses/. Executing manipulation can lead to improper control of dynamically-identified variables. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit has been published and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X