Comparison Overview

OneAdvanced Health & Care

VS

ThunderSoft

OneAdvanced Health & Care

210 Eureka Park, Ashford, Kent, TN25 4AZ, GB
Last Update: 2025-02-26 (UTC)
Between 800 and 900

Strong

We power the world of work through our health and care software portfolio that effortlessly get the job done.

NAICS: 5415
NAICS Definition: Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees: 0
Subsidiaries: 14
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

ThunderSoft

รŠยตโˆ‘รŠโˆ‘ร„ร‚รฅโˆซรŠโˆร–ร‚รงรฉโ€ฐโˆรบร‹โˆ‘ร˜9ร‚รจโˆ‘รˆรดยข3ร‚รจโˆ‘รŠโ€ขยบร‚ร รตร‹รฆรฆร‚ยงรŸร‚รฉยถ ร‚รฅรณโ€ฐโˆซยจ, ร‚รฅรณโ€ฐโˆซยจ 100191, CN
Last Update: 2025-05-06 (UTC)

Strong

Between 800 and 900

ThunderSoft is a provider of operating system technologies, superior products and solutions, experts in mobile, IoT, automotive, and enterprise. Founded in 2008, through ThunderSoftโ€šร„รดs expertise in edge intelligence and operating systems including Android, Linux, Windows and others, a profound middleware, application, and algorithm technology portfolio, strategic partnerships with key semiconductors, components, terminals, software and Internet vendors, and mobile carriers, give us a unique vertical integration advantage across industries. ThunderSoft is a value-added scaling partner, bringing our customers with innovative, reliable, and commercial-ready products and solutions for the fields of IoT and Intelligent connected vehicle. ThunderSoft has established joint ventures individually with Qualcomm, Arm and Intel. Meanwhile, the company operates joint laboratories with Qualcomm, Intel, Microsoft, Arm, Samsung, and Sony, among many others. The extensive collaboration with industries empowers ThunderSoft to accelerate the development of the smart industry. Headquartered in Beijing and listed on the Shenzhen Stock Exchange (SZ: 300496), We have 40 R&D centers and offices in China and a global presence in Germany, Finland, Bulgaria, Ukraine, Japan, South Korea, India, Malaysia, Singapore, Canada, U.S, etc.

NAICS: 5415
NAICS Definition: Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees: 10,001+
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/oneadvanced-health-and-care.jpeg
OneAdvanced Health & Care
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/thundersoft.jpeg
ThunderSoft
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
Compliance Summary
OneAdvanced Health & Care
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
ThunderSoft
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for OneAdvanced Health & Care in 2025.

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ThunderSoft in 2025.

Incident History โ€” OneAdvanced Health & Care (X = Date, Y = Severity)

OneAdvanced Health & Care cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History โ€” ThunderSoft (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ThunderSoft cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/oneadvanced-health-and-care.jpeg
OneAdvanced Health & Care
Incidents

Date Detected: 08/2022
Type:Ransomware
Motivation: Financial gain
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/thundersoft.jpeg
ThunderSoft
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both OneAdvanced Health & Care company and ThunderSoft company demonstrate a comparable AI risk posture, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

OneAdvanced Health & Care company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas ThunderSoft company has not reported any.

In the current year, ThunderSoft company and OneAdvanced Health & Care company have not reported any cyber incidents.

OneAdvanced Health & Care company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while ThunderSoft company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither ThunderSoft company nor OneAdvanced Health & Care company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither ThunderSoft company nor OneAdvanced Health & Care company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither OneAdvanced Health & Care company nor ThunderSoft company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

OneAdvanced Health & Care company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to ThunderSoft company.

Neither OneAdvanced Health & Care company nor ThunderSoft company has publicly disclosed the exact number of their employees.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was found in LaChatterie Verger up to 1.2.10. This impacts the function redirectToAuthorization of the file /src/main/services/mcp/oauth/provider.ts. The manipulation of the argument URL results in deserialization. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit has been made public and could be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A vulnerability has been found in SeriaWei ZKEACMS up to 4.3. This affects the function Delete of the file src/ZKEACMS.Redirection/Controllers/UrlRedirectionController.cs of the component POST Request Handler. The manipulation leads to improper authorization. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:N/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: jfs: fix invalid free of JFS_IP(ipimap)->i_imap in diUnmount syzbot found an invalid-free in diUnmount: BUG: KASAN: double-free in slab_free mm/slub.c:3661 [inline] BUG: KASAN: double-free in __kmem_cache_free+0x71/0x110 mm/slub.c:3674 Free of addr ffff88806f410000 by task syz-executor131/3632 CPU: 0 PID: 3632 Comm: syz-executor131 Not tainted 6.1.0-rc7-syzkaller-00012-gca57f02295f1 #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 10/26/2022 Call Trace: <TASK> __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline] dump_stack_lvl+0x1b1/0x28e lib/dump_stack.c:106 print_address_description+0x74/0x340 mm/kasan/report.c:284 print_report+0x107/0x1f0 mm/kasan/report.c:395 kasan_report_invalid_free+0xac/0xd0 mm/kasan/report.c:460 ____kasan_slab_free+0xfb/0x120 kasan_slab_free include/linux/kasan.h:177 [inline] slab_free_hook mm/slub.c:1724 [inline] slab_free_freelist_hook+0x12e/0x1a0 mm/slub.c:1750 slab_free mm/slub.c:3661 [inline] __kmem_cache_free+0x71/0x110 mm/slub.c:3674 diUnmount+0xef/0x100 fs/jfs/jfs_imap.c:195 jfs_umount+0x108/0x370 fs/jfs/jfs_umount.c:63 jfs_put_super+0x86/0x190 fs/jfs/super.c:194 generic_shutdown_super+0x130/0x310 fs/super.c:492 kill_block_super+0x79/0xd0 fs/super.c:1428 deactivate_locked_super+0xa7/0xf0 fs/super.c:332 cleanup_mnt+0x494/0x520 fs/namespace.c:1186 task_work_run+0x243/0x300 kernel/task_work.c:179 exit_task_work include/linux/task_work.h:38 [inline] do_exit+0x664/0x2070 kernel/exit.c:820 do_group_exit+0x1fd/0x2b0 kernel/exit.c:950 __do_sys_exit_group kernel/exit.c:961 [inline] __se_sys_exit_group kernel/exit.c:959 [inline] __x64_sys_exit_group+0x3b/0x40 kernel/exit.c:959 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline] do_syscall_64+0x3d/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd [...] JFS_IP(ipimap)->i_imap is not setting to NULL after free in diUnmount. If jfs_remount() free JFS_IP(ipimap)->i_imap but then failed at diMount(). JFS_IP(ipimap)->i_imap will be freed once again. Fix this problem by setting JFS_IP(ipimap)->i_imap to NULL after free.

Description

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: scsi: qla2xxx: Fix deletion race condition System crash when using debug kernel due to link list corruption. The cause of the link list corruption is due to session deletion was allowed to queue up twice. Here's the internal trace that show the same port was allowed to double queue for deletion on different cpu. 20808683956 015 qla2xxx [0000:13:00.1]-e801:4: Scheduling sess ffff93ebf9306800 for deletion 50:06:0e:80:12:48:ff:50 fc4_type 1 20808683957 027 qla2xxx [0000:13:00.1]-e801:4: Scheduling sess ffff93ebf9306800 for deletion 50:06:0e:80:12:48:ff:50 fc4_type 1 Move the clearing/setting of deleted flag lock.

Description

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: mm/ksm: fix race with VMA iteration and mm_struct teardown exit_mmap() will tear down the VMAs and maple tree with the mmap_lock held in write mode. Ensure that the maple tree is still valid by checking ksm_test_exit() after taking the mmap_lock in read mode, but before the for_each_vma() iterator dereferences a destroyed maple tree. Since the maple tree is destroyed, the flags telling lockdep to check an external lock has been cleared. Skip the for_each_vma() iterator to avoid dereferencing a maple tree without the external lock flag, which would create a lockdep warning.