Comparison Overview

One Senior Care

VS

Health Technology Centre

One Senior Care

100 State Street, Suite 200, Erie, Pennsylvania, US, 16507
Last Update: 2025-11-21

One Senior Care is the nation’s leading PACE provider to rural and Appalachian communities. We have uniquely created reliable care that addresses several challenges faced by these communities. By bringing comprehensive healthcare services to underserved regions, we can help overcome barriers such as limited access to healthcare facilities, shortages of healthcare professionals, and transportation difficulties. Additionally, our program can alleviate the financial burdens associated with healthcare costs for seniors in these areas, ensuring they receive the necessary care without facing financial hardships. Through our community-based approach, we can also tackle social isolation and loneliness often experienced by seniors in rural settings, fostering a sense of belonging and providing much-needed social support. Together, we strive to eliminate healthcare disparities and improve the well-being of seniors in rural and Appalachian areas, ensuring they receive the care they deserve.

NAICS: 923
NAICS Definition: Administration of Human Resource Programs
Employees: 54
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Health Technology Centre

None
Last Update: 2025-11-21

The Health Technology Centre at Te Matatiki Toi Ora The Arts Centre is a co-working space for a cluster of health technology companies and the wider community to work from a unique and collaborative environment. Our founding tenants include The Johner Institute, oVRcome, Myovolt, The Kite Program, ContentedAI, Komodo, The Honest Human, Calmly, Ignite Aotearoa, Big Chats, Celo and Swell Group. The long-term ambition is for this to become more than just a place for health technology companies to co-locate, it will become a community of connection, inspiration, and support, through the development of the Health Tech Quadrant whereby advisory services such as commercial, intellectual property, investment, strategy, export, quality and regulatory advice are wrapped around these companies to provide the support high growth companies need to succeed. The Health Technology Centre boasts over 1,000m2 of light, spacious offices, co-working spaces, and associated facilities. The shared facilities of the Health Technology Centre are also available for the wider health technology community to use to host meetings or events.

NAICS: 923
NAICS Definition: Administration of Human Resource Programs
Employees: None
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/one-senior-care.jpeg
One Senior Care
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/health-technology-centre.jpeg
Health Technology Centre
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
One Senior Care
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Health Technology Centre
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Health and Human Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for One Senior Care in 2025.

Incidents vs Health and Human Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Health Technology Centre in 2025.

Incident History — One Senior Care (X = Date, Y = Severity)

One Senior Care cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Health Technology Centre (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Health Technology Centre cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/one-senior-care.jpeg
One Senior Care
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/health-technology-centre.jpeg
Health Technology Centre
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Health Technology Centre company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to One Senior Care company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Health Technology Centre company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to One Senior Care company.

In the current year, Health Technology Centre company and One Senior Care company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Health Technology Centre company nor One Senior Care company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Health Technology Centre company nor One Senior Care company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Health Technology Centre company nor One Senior Care company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither One Senior Care company nor Health Technology Centre company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither One Senior Care nor Health Technology Centre holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Health Technology Centre company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to One Senior Care company.

Neither One Senior Care nor Health Technology Centre holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither One Senior Care nor Health Technology Centre holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither One Senior Care nor Health Technology Centre holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither One Senior Care nor Health Technology Centre holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither One Senior Care nor Health Technology Centre holds HIPAA certification.

Neither One Senior Care nor Health Technology Centre holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H