Comparison Overview

One Key Escrow

VS

NEF

One Key Escrow

330 N. Brand Blvd., Glendale, CA, 91203, US
Last Update: 2025-03-08 (UTC)
Between 900 and 1000
https://www.onekeyescrow.com

Excellent

One Key Escrow was founded in 2009 to accommodate the needs of real estate agents and brokers looking for a more flexible, understanding, and certain, choice for escrow services. As a result of the 2008 mortgage meltdown, the real estate market in southern California suffered and many escrow firms fell by the wayside; leaving only a handful of companies for Brokers and Agents to choose from. Whether it was the lack of competition in the industry, or the fact that these escrow firms were not familiar with the “new” real estate market, many agents felt they were receiving sub-par service. We, at One Key Escrow, understand that just because you have someone’s business doesn’t mean that you should stop earning it.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 8
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

NEF

2150 Washington Suite 100 Newton, MA 02462, US
Last Update: 2025-05-04 (UTC)

Excellent

Between 900 and 1000
https://www.cbre.us

NEF, Inc., is a professional services firm specializing in several key areas of IT infrastructure, including cloud, multi-national connectivity, data center and colocation, and business IT optimization. As a leading IT infrastructure advisement resource, NEF leverages decades of experience and subject-matter expertise to provide objective, data-driven advisement across planning, design, procurement and installation. Whether you're deploying new infrastructure or are seeking to bolster operations with additional services, NEF's advisors can address a variety of challenges and opportunities that emerge throughout an enterprise's life cycle. Show more Show less

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 10,001+
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/one-key-escrow.jpeg
One Key Escrow
—
ISO 27001
Not verified
—
SOC 2
Not verified
—
GDPR
No public badge
—
PCI DSS
No public badge
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/nef.jpeg
NEF
—
ISO 27001
Not verified
—
SOC 2
Not verified
—
GDPR
No public badge
—
PCI DSS
No public badge
Compliance Summary
One Key Escrow
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
NEF
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Real Estate Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for One Key Escrow in 2025.

Incidents vs Real Estate Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for NEF in 2025.

Incident History — One Key Escrow (X = Date, Y = Severity)

One Key Escrow cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — NEF (X = Date, Y = Severity)

NEF cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/one-key-escrow.jpeg
One Key Escrow
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/nef.jpeg
NEF
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both One Key Escrow company and NEF company demonstrate a comparable AI risk posture, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, NEF company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to One Key Escrow company.

In the current year, NEF company and One Key Escrow company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither NEF company nor One Key Escrow company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither NEF company nor One Key Escrow company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither NEF company nor One Key Escrow company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither One Key Escrow company nor NEF company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither One Key Escrow company nor NEF company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

One Key Escrow company employs more people globally than NEF company, reflecting its scale as a Real Estate.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

An issue was discovered in chinabugotech hutool before 5.8.4 allowing attackers to execute arbitrary expressions that lead to arbitrary method invocation and potentially remote code execution (RCE) via the QLExpressEngine class.

Published
Date
2025-09-25
Updated
Date
2025-09-25
References
Description

A weakness has been identified in JeecgBoot up to 3.8.2. The impacted element is an unknown function of the file /sys/role/exportXls. This manipulation causes improper authorization. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be exploited. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Published
Date
2025-09-25
Updated
Date
2025-09-25
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 4.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

A security flaw has been discovered in JeecgBoot up to 3.8.2. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /sys/user/exportXls of the component Filter Handler. The manipulation results in improper authorization. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit has been released to the public and may be exploited. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Published
Date
2025-09-25
Updated
Date
2025-09-25
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 4.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

A vulnerability was identified in JeecgBoot up to 3.8.2. Impacted is an unknown function of the file /sys/tenant/deleteBatch. The manipulation of the argument ids leads to improper authorization. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. The complexity of an attack is rather high. The exploitability is considered difficult. The exploit is publicly available and might be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Published
Date
2025-09-25
Updated
Date
2025-09-25
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 2.1
Severity: HIGH
AV:N/AC:H/Au:S/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 3.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 2.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

A vulnerability was determined in JeecgBoot up to 3.8.2. This issue affects some unknown processing of the file /api/getDepartUserList. Executing manipulation of the argument departId can lead to improper authorization. The attack can be executed remotely. This attack is characterized by high complexity. The exploitability is assessed as difficult. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Published
Date
2025-09-25
Updated
Date
2025-09-25
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 2.1
Severity: HIGH
AV:N/AC:H/Au:S/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 3.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 2.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References