Comparison Overview

OnCue Technology

VS

Lyndsay Markley Law

OnCue Technology

undefined, Houston, undefined, undefined, US
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 700 and 749

OnCue is professional trial presentation software. In use since 2010 and used in thousands of trials every year OnCue is the fastest growing trial presentation program for good reason. - No workarounds: solid workflows with built in power features - No lag: speed abounds in displaying evidence and building massive databases - Wow-worthy support: we answer question in minutes, not days - Free trial: learn it and we bet you’ll love it - Flexible subscriptions: no “maintenance fees”

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 9
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Lyndsay Markley Law

150 N Michigan Ave, Ste. 800, Chicago, Illinois 60601, US
Last Update: 2025-11-24
Between 750 and 799

Lyndsay Markley Law is a premier law firm in Chicago, Illinois that is dedicated to representing the rights of victims in personal injury and wrongful death claims. Our firm is dedicated to the recovery, respect, and humanization of injured people. Our firm is not afraid to take on complex cases or big opposition. In the span of four short years, our commitment to our clients has resulted in tens of millions of dollars for them in a variety of different practice areas. Lyndsay Markley Law offers great results and a straightforward, communicative approach that lifts the veil on litigation for our clients. In fact, many of our clients feel like they are a member of the Lyndsay Markley Law family. With a fighting mentality and proven results, Lyndsay Markley Law is a firm you can lean on.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/oncue-technology.jpeg
OnCue Technology
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-law-office-of-lyndsay-a.-markley-ltd..jpeg
Lyndsay Markley Law
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
OnCue Technology
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Lyndsay Markley Law
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for OnCue Technology in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Lyndsay Markley Law in 2025.

Incident History — OnCue Technology (X = Date, Y = Severity)

OnCue Technology cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Lyndsay Markley Law (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Lyndsay Markley Law cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/oncue-technology.jpeg
OnCue Technology
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-law-office-of-lyndsay-a.-markley-ltd..jpeg
Lyndsay Markley Law
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Lyndsay Markley Law company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to OnCue Technology company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Lyndsay Markley Law company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to OnCue Technology company.

In the current year, Lyndsay Markley Law company and OnCue Technology company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Lyndsay Markley Law company nor OnCue Technology company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Lyndsay Markley Law company nor OnCue Technology company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Lyndsay Markley Law company nor OnCue Technology company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither OnCue Technology company nor Lyndsay Markley Law company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither OnCue Technology nor Lyndsay Markley Law holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither OnCue Technology company nor Lyndsay Markley Law company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

OnCue Technology company employs more people globally than Lyndsay Markley Law company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither OnCue Technology nor Lyndsay Markley Law holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither OnCue Technology nor Lyndsay Markley Law holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither OnCue Technology nor Lyndsay Markley Law holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither OnCue Technology nor Lyndsay Markley Law holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither OnCue Technology nor Lyndsay Markley Law holds HIPAA certification.

Neither OnCue Technology nor Lyndsay Markley Law holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X