Comparison Overview

On Display, Ltd.

VS

Phoenix Color Corp.

On Display, Ltd.

1250 Clough Pike, Batavia, 45103, US
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 750 and 799

We’re more than print production experts – we’re industry leaders. Whether you need menu boards, POP displays, banners, or yard signs, we provide you with high quality product, on time and on budget. Even if the project parameters change, turnaround time gets quicker or budget gets tighter, you can be sure our approach and commitment will not.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 28
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Phoenix Color Corp.

18249 Phoenix Drive, None, Hagerstown, MD, US, 21742
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

Phoenix Color® is a full-service, full-color printer of cover components, heavily-illustrated and juvenile books, as well as specialty commercial products such as collectible cards, posters, box wraps, game boards, folders, catalogs and brochures. We have been servicing the publishing industry within the United States and Canada since 1979 and have formed lasting relationships with some of the biggest names in book publishing. With our technologically advanced prepress and press operations, a knowledgeable customer service team, and dependable freight services, Phoenix Color® is committed to delivering high-quality products to ours customers. Our manufacturing facility is located in Hagerstown, MD, with over 600 employees company wide dedicated to manufacturing quality sheet-fed products. Phoenix Color® remains committed to developing new products and printing techniques that bring your ideas to life. We welcome the challenge to serve your needs better than ever.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 158
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/on-display-ltd..jpeg
On Display, Ltd.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lehigh-phoenix.jpeg
Phoenix Color Corp.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
On Display, Ltd.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Phoenix Color Corp.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for On Display, Ltd. in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Phoenix Color Corp. in 2025.

Incident History — On Display, Ltd. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

On Display, Ltd. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Phoenix Color Corp. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Phoenix Color Corp. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/on-display-ltd..jpeg
On Display, Ltd.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lehigh-phoenix.jpeg
Phoenix Color Corp.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Phoenix Color Corp. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to On Display, Ltd. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Phoenix Color Corp. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to On Display, Ltd. company.

In the current year, Phoenix Color Corp. company and On Display, Ltd. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Phoenix Color Corp. company nor On Display, Ltd. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Phoenix Color Corp. company nor On Display, Ltd. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Phoenix Color Corp. company nor On Display, Ltd. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither On Display, Ltd. company nor Phoenix Color Corp. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither On Display, Ltd. nor Phoenix Color Corp. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither On Display, Ltd. company nor Phoenix Color Corp. company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Phoenix Color Corp. company employs more people globally than On Display, Ltd. company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither On Display, Ltd. nor Phoenix Color Corp. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither On Display, Ltd. nor Phoenix Color Corp. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither On Display, Ltd. nor Phoenix Color Corp. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither On Display, Ltd. nor Phoenix Color Corp. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither On Display, Ltd. nor Phoenix Color Corp. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither On Display, Ltd. nor Phoenix Color Corp. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N