Comparison Overview

Provizor Federal, Inc.

VS

Robert Half

Provizor Federal, Inc.

undefined, Columbia, MD, undefined, US
Last Update: 2025-03-05 (UTC)

Excellent

Provizor Federal manages thousands of healthcare professionals at military base facilities across the continental United States and its territories. We focus on long-term staffing and medical support services under multi-year federal contracts. We are not an agency nor a placement service! Currently, we maintain thousands health care workers in our national database, including on-call 24-hours-a-day staffing of nurses and other health care professionals. ***NEW WEBSITE PENDING***

NAICS: 561
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 82
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Robert Half

2884 Sand Hill Road Suite 200, None, Menlo Park, CA, US, 94025
Last Update: 2025-07-29 (UTC)

Excellent

Between 900 and 1000

๐Ÿ”’ At Robert Half, we prioritize your securityโ€”if you believe you've encountered a scam or fraudulent recruiter, please report it immediately to https://www.roberthalf.com/us/en/fraud-alert. All Robert Half recruiters communicate using their corporate email address, ending in roberthalf.com. ๐Ÿ‘‹ Welcome to Robert Half. We're the worldโ€™s first and largest specialized talent solutions firm, connecting opportunities at great companies with highly skilled job seekers. We provide dynamic contract, temporary, and permanent placement solutions across finance, accounting, technology, marketing, creative, legal, and administrative sectors. ๐Ÿ† In the last 12 months, Robert Half has been recognized as one of Americaโ€™s Most Innovative Companies by Fortune, and with Protiviti, has been named one of the Fortuneยฎ World's Most Admired Companiesโ„ข and 100 Best Companies to Work For. ๐Ÿฆ Traded on the New York Stock Exchange (symbol: RHI), weโ€™re at the forefront of innovation in talent acquisition.

NAICS: 5613
NAICS Definition: Employment Services
Employees: 28,722
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/omv-medical-inc-.jpeg
Provizor Federal, Inc.
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/robert-half-international.jpeg
Robert Half
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
Compliance Summary
Provizor Federal, Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Robert Half
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Staffing and Recruiting Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Provizor Federal, Inc. in 2025.

Incidents vs Staffing and Recruiting Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Robert Half in 2025.

Incident History โ€” Provizor Federal, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Provizor Federal, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History โ€” Robert Half (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Robert Half cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/omv-medical-inc-.jpeg
Provizor Federal, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/robert-half-international.jpeg
Robert Half
Incidents

Date Detected: 06/2022
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unauthorized Access
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 4/2022
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: External Hacking
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Both Provizor Federal, Inc. company and Robert Half company demonstrate a comparable AI risk posture, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Robert Half company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Provizor Federal, Inc. company has not reported any.

In the current year, Robert Half company and Provizor Federal, Inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Robert Half company nor Provizor Federal, Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Robert Half company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Provizor Federal, Inc. company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Robert Half company nor Provizor Federal, Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Provizor Federal, Inc. company nor Robert Half company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Provizor Federal, Inc. company nor Robert Half company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Robert Half company employs more people globally than Provizor Federal, Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Staffing and Recruiting.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Quadient DS-700 iQ devices through 2025-09-30 might have a race condition during the quick clicking of (in order) the Question Mark button, the Help Button, the About button, and the Help Button, leading to a transition out of kiosk mode into local administrative access. NOTE: the reporter indicates that the "behavior was observed sporadically" during "limited time on the client site," making it not "possible to gain more information about the specific kiosk mode crashing issue," and the only conclusion was "there appears to be some form of race condition." Accordingly, there can be doubt that a reproducible cybersecurity vulnerability was identified; sporadic software crashes can also be caused by a hardware fault on a single device (for example, transient RAM errors). The reporter also describes a variety of other issues, including initial access via USB because of the absence of a "lock-pick resistant locking solution for the External Controller PC cabinet," which is not a cybersecurity vulnerability (section 4.1.5 of the CNA Operational Rules). Finally, it is unclear whether the device or OS configuration was inappropriate, given that the risks are typically limited to insider threats within the mail operations room of a large company.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.4
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Argo CD is a declarative, GitOps continuous delivery tool for Kubernetes. Versions between 2.1.0 and 2.14.19, 3.2.0-rc1, 3.1.0-rc1 through 3.1.7, and 3.0.0-rc1 through 3.0.18 contain a race condition in the repository credentials handler that can cause the Argo CD server to panic and crash when concurrent operations are performed on the same repository URL. The vulnerability is located in numerous repository related handlers in the util/db/repository_secrets.go file. A valid API token with repositories resource permissions (create, update, or delete actions) is required to trigger the race condition. This vulnerability causes the entire Argo CD server to crash and become unavailable. Attackers can repeatedly and continuously trigger the race condition to maintain a denial-of-service state, disrupting all GitOps operations. This issue is fixed in versions 2.14.20, 3.2.0-rc2, 3.1.8 and 3.0.19.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Stored cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in Web Content translation in Liferay Portal 7.4.0 through 7.4.3.112, and older unsupported versions, and Liferay DXP 2023.Q4.0 through 2023.Q4.8, 2023.Q3.1 through 2023.Q3.10, 7.4 GA through update 92, and older unsupported versions allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via any rich text field in a web content article.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 4.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Keysight Ixia Vision has an issue with hardcoded cryptographic material which may allow an attacker to intercept or decrypt payloads sent to the device via API calls or user authentication if the end user does not replace the TLS certificate that shipped with the device. Remediation is available in Version 6.9.1, released on September 23, 2025.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

An Insecure Direct Object Reference (IDOR) in the /dashboard/notes endpoint of Syaqui Collegetivity v1.0.0 allows attackers to impersonate other users and perform arbitrary operations via a crafted POST request.