Comparison Overview

OMSI

VS

Charles Dickens Museum

OMSI

1945 SE Water Ave., None, Portland, Oregon, US, 97214
Last Update: 2026-01-22
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.omsi.edu

The Oregon Museum of Science and Industry (OMSI) is a nationally-renowned science center providing science learning to a range of audiences. Our programming is guided by OMSI’s long-term vision to promote a healthy, innovative, and sustainable society where everyone is prepared to participate in civic life. OMSI’s science, technology, engineering, art and mathematics (STEAM) programming helps visitors and program participants master 21st-century skills such as critical thinking, problem solving and collaboration. We achieve this vision through exhibits, classes, camps, traveling educators, and adult programs around the state, making OMSI a trusted educational resource to all Oregonians.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 399
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Charles Dickens Museum

48Doughty St, London, Greater London WC1N 2LX, GB
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799
http://dickensmuseum.com

Charles Dickens Museum holds one of the most important collections of Dickens ephemera in the world. The Museum is based at 48 Doughty Street in Charles Dickens’s only surviving London family home. Dickens lived in this house from 1837 until 1839 and wrote Oliver Twist and Nicholas Nickleby whilst living here. We offer visitors the chance to step back in time and experience Dickens’s home as if he had just stepped out the door.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 38
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/omsi.jpeg
OMSI
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-charles-dickens-museum-limited.jpeg
Charles Dickens Museum
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
OMSI
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Charles Dickens Museum
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for OMSI in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Charles Dickens Museum in 2026.

Incident History — OMSI (X = Date, Y = Severity)

OMSI cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Charles Dickens Museum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Charles Dickens Museum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/omsi.jpeg
OMSI
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-charles-dickens-museum-limited.jpeg
Charles Dickens Museum
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

OMSI company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Charles Dickens Museum company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Charles Dickens Museum company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to OMSI company.

In the current year, Charles Dickens Museum company and OMSI company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Charles Dickens Museum company nor OMSI company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Charles Dickens Museum company nor OMSI company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Charles Dickens Museum company nor OMSI company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither OMSI company nor Charles Dickens Museum company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither OMSI nor Charles Dickens Museum holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither OMSI company nor Charles Dickens Museum company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

OMSI company employs more people globally than Charles Dickens Museum company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither OMSI nor Charles Dickens Museum holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither OMSI nor Charles Dickens Museum holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither OMSI nor Charles Dickens Museum holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither OMSI nor Charles Dickens Museum holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither OMSI nor Charles Dickens Museum holds HIPAA certification.

Neither OMSI nor Charles Dickens Museum holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Typemill is a flat-file, Markdown-based CMS designed for informational documentation websites. A reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) exists in the login error view template `login.twig` of versions 2.19.1 and below. The `username` value can be echoed back without proper contextual encoding when authentication fails. An attacker can execute script in the login page context. This issue has been fixed in version 2.19.2.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
References
Description

A DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the DomainCheckerApp class within domain/script.js of Sourcecodester Domain Availability Checker v1.0. The vulnerability occurs because the application improperly handles user-supplied data in the createResultElement method by using the unsafe innerHTML property to render domain search results.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References
Description

A Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability exists in Sourcecodester Modern Image Gallery App v1.0 within the gallery/upload.php component. The application fails to properly validate uploaded file contents. Additionally, the application preserves the user-supplied file extension during the save process. This allows an unauthenticated attacker to upload arbitrary PHP code by spoofing the MIME type as an image, leading to full system compromise.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References
Description

A UNIX symbolic link following issue in the jailer component in Firecracker version v1.13.1 and earlier and 1.14.0 on Linux may allow a local host user with write access to the pre-created jailer directories to overwrite arbitrary host files via a symlink attack during the initialization copy at jailer startup, if the jailer is executed with root privileges. To mitigate this issue, users should upgrade to version v1.13.2 or 1.14.1 or above.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the /srvs/membersrv/getCashiers endpoint of the Aptsys gemscms backend platform thru 2025-05-28. This unauthenticated endpoint returns a list of cashier accounts, including names, email addresses, usernames, and passwords hashed using MD5. As MD5 is a broken cryptographic function, the hashes can be easily reversed using public tools, exposing user credentials in plaintext. This allows remote attackers to perform unauthorized logins and potentially gain access to sensitive POS operations or backend functions.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References