Comparison Overview

Omnimark BV

VS

Graphica Display

Omnimark BV

Hogeweyselaan 73, Weesp, 1382 JK, NL
Last Update: 2026-03-28
Between 750 and 799

Omnimark is a corporate identity care center where we manage your out of home identity. Your identity (or image as perceived by your customers) is of great importance nowadays. We audit, offer advice, produce and apply self-adhesive materials that visualize your companies identity. Your Fleet, company building, sales subsidiaries are some examples where your identity needs to be perceived. in Dutch: Omnimark maakt het onmogelijke haalbaar. Het in de praktijk realiseren van door design- en reclamebureaus ontwikkelde ontwerpen is onze dagelijkse kost. Wij vertalen de creatieve gedachten tot in de praktijk doorgevoerde campagnes op bewegende, stilstaande en lichtgevende objecten. Of het nu vrachtwagens zijn of gebouwen, bestelwagens of stationcars, winkels of musea, lichtbakken of trams, vliegtuigen of boten, Omnimark brengt uw corporate image altijd en overal duidelijk en duurzaam in beeld. En zelfs corporate uitingen op gereedschappen, gasflessen of bierfusten behoren tot ons vakgebied.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 36
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Graphica Display

Unit 31, Trident Court, Chessington, KT9 1RH, GB
Last Update: 2026-03-31

Graphica Display are a large format printing company based in London, operating accross the UK and Europe. As a design led printer, they understand the design process and produce every project both on time and in budget. Unlike many of their competitors, Graphica Display operate and all encompassing service, from image sourcing and setting to production and quality nationwide installation. We can produce and install large format graphics including lightboxes, graphic walls and cut or printed vinyl for the retail, commercial, exhibition and event markets.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 15
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/omnimark-bv.jpeg
Omnimark BV
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/graphica-display.jpeg
Graphica Display
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Omnimark BV
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Graphica Display
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Omnimark BV in 2026.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Graphica Display in 2026.

Incident History — Omnimark BV (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Omnimark BV cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Graphica Display (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Graphica Display cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/omnimark-bv.jpeg
Omnimark BV
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/graphica-display.jpeg
Graphica Display
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Omnimark BV company and Graphica Display company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Graphica Display company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Omnimark BV company.

In the current year, Graphica Display company and Omnimark BV company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Graphica Display company nor Omnimark BV company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Graphica Display company nor Omnimark BV company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Graphica Display company nor Omnimark BV company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Omnimark BV company nor Graphica Display company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Omnimark BV nor Graphica Display holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Omnimark BV company nor Graphica Display company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Omnimark BV company employs more people globally than Graphica Display company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Omnimark BV nor Graphica Display holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Omnimark BV nor Graphica Display holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Omnimark BV nor Graphica Display holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Omnimark BV nor Graphica Display holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Omnimark BV nor Graphica Display holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Omnimark BV nor Graphica Display holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

nimiq/core-rs-albatross is a Rust implementation of the Nimiq Proof-of-Stake protocol based on the Albatross consensus algorithm. Prior to version 1.3.0, two peer-facing consensus request handlers assume that the history index is always available and call blockchain.history_store.history_index().unwrap() directly. That assumption is false by construction. HistoryStoreProxy::history_index() explicitly returns None for the valid HistoryStoreProxy::WithoutIndex state. when a full node is syncing or otherwise running without the history index, a remote peer can send RequestTransactionsProof or RequestTransactionReceiptsByAddress and trigger an Option::unwrap() panic on the request path. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 1.5.95, FileTools.download_file() in praisonaiagents validates the destination path but performs no validation on the url parameter, passing it directly to httpx.stream() with follow_redirects=True. An attacker who controls the URL can reach any host accessible from the server including cloud metadata services and internal network services. This issue has been patched in version 1.5.95.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, OAuthManager.validate_token() returns True for any token not found in its internal store, which is empty by default. Any HTTP request to the MCP server with an arbitrary Bearer token is treated as authenticated, granting full access to all registered tools and agent capabilities. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, the PraisonAI Gateway server accepts WebSocket connections at /ws and serves agent topology at /info with no authentication. Any network client can connect, enumerate registered agents, and send arbitrary messages to agents and their tool sets. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.90, MCPToolIndex.search_tools() compiles a caller-supplied string directly as a Python regular expression with no validation, sanitization, or timeout. A crafted regex causes catastrophic backtracking in the re engine, blocking the Python thread for hundreds of seconds and causing a complete service outage. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.90.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H