Comparison Overview

OMK

VS

BFX Furniture

OMK

30 Gresse Street, London, W1T 1QR, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 750 and 799

Founded in 1965, OMK makes design led furniture to enhance public spaces. Its award winning product range is designed and developed by OMK’s in-house design team, lead by company founder Rodney Kinsman RDI. OMK’s continued vision is to design innovative products that utilise high quality manufacturing techniques and materials. Seating systems from OMK carry a 25 year warranty and can be found in over 350 transport terminals, hospitals and public spaces worldwide. AWARDS: 2016 – Winner of Queen’s Award for Export 2015 – FLITE wins Design Guild Mark Award 2011 – Shortlisted for D&AD Award 2006 – Prince Phillip Designers Prize for funder Rodney Kinsman 1998 – Seville Seating System receives a ‘Millennium Products Award from the Design Council 1994 – Winner of the European Community Design Prize 1991 –British Design Award for TRAX seating system 1990 – Rodney Kinsman appointed Royal Designer for Industry 1990 – European Community Design Prize 1984 – Gatwick seating system picks up the Design Council Award

NAICS: 337
NAICS Definition: Furniture and Related Product Manufacturing
Employees: 29
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

BFX Furniture

46 Paulger Flat Road, Yandina, Queensland, 4561, AU
Last Update: 2025-11-25
Between 750 and 799

BFX is one of Australia’s leading manufacturers and suppliers of furniture in the Corporate, Government, Education and Healthcare sectors. BFX delivers a complete solution, with experienced Consultants trained in space design & project management. Consultants collaborate with in-house furniture designers, interior designers and logistics teams. Connect with us, we'd like to hear from you: facebook.com/BFXfurniture twitter.com/BFXfurniture youtube.com/bizfurn www.bfx.com.au/articles/

NAICS: 337
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 105
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/omk-design.jpeg
OMK
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bfx-furniture.jpeg
BFX Furniture
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
OMK
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
BFX Furniture
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Furniture and Home Furnishings Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for OMK in 2025.

Incidents vs Furniture and Home Furnishings Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for BFX Furniture in 2025.

Incident History — OMK (X = Date, Y = Severity)

OMK cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — BFX Furniture (X = Date, Y = Severity)

BFX Furniture cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/omk-design.jpeg
OMK
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bfx-furniture.jpeg
BFX Furniture
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

BFX Furniture company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to OMK company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, BFX Furniture company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to OMK company.

In the current year, BFX Furniture company and OMK company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither BFX Furniture company nor OMK company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither BFX Furniture company nor OMK company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither BFX Furniture company nor OMK company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither OMK company nor BFX Furniture company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither OMK nor BFX Furniture holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither OMK company nor BFX Furniture company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

BFX Furniture company employs more people globally than OMK company, reflecting its scale as a Furniture and Home Furnishings Manufacturing.

Neither OMK nor BFX Furniture holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither OMK nor BFX Furniture holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither OMK nor BFX Furniture holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither OMK nor BFX Furniture holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither OMK nor BFX Furniture holds HIPAA certification.

Neither OMK nor BFX Furniture holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.