Comparison Overview

Oakland Museum of California

VS

Corning Museum of Glass

Oakland Museum of California

1000 Oak Street, Oakland, CA, 94607, US
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799

The Oakland Museum of California (OMCA) tells the many stories that comprise California, creating the space and context for greater connection, trust, and understanding between people. Through its inclusive exhibitions, public programs, educational initiatives, and cultural events, OMCA brings Californians together and inspires greater understanding about what our state’s art, history, and natural surroundings teach us about ourselves and each other. With more than 1.9 million objects, OMCA brings together its multi-disciplinary collections of art, history, and natural science with the first-person accounts and often untold narratives of California, all within its 110,000 square feet of gallery space and seven-acre campus. OMCA is a leading cultural institution of the Bay Area and a resource for the research and understanding of California's dynamic cultural and environmental heritage for visitors from the region, the state, and around the world.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 185
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Corning Museum of Glass

1 Museum Way, Corning, NY, 14830, US
Last Update: 2025-12-02
Between 750 and 799

The Corning Museum of Glass is the world's largest glass museum, featuring live glassblowing demonstrations, 3,500 years of glass history, contemporary glass art and design, Make Your Own Glass experiences for all ages, and international Shops. The Museum's Rakow Library houses more than 400,000 items on glass and glassmaking, from the 12th century to the present, including publications in 41 languages.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 245
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/omca.jpeg
Oakland Museum of California
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/corning-museum-of-glass.jpeg
Corning Museum of Glass
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Oakland Museum of California
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Corning Museum of Glass
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Oakland Museum of California in 2025.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Corning Museum of Glass in 2025.

Incident History — Oakland Museum of California (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Oakland Museum of California cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Corning Museum of Glass (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Corning Museum of Glass cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/omca.jpeg
Oakland Museum of California
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/corning-museum-of-glass.jpeg
Corning Museum of Glass
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Oakland Museum of California company and Corning Museum of Glass company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Corning Museum of Glass company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Oakland Museum of California company.

In the current year, Corning Museum of Glass company and Oakland Museum of California company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Corning Museum of Glass company nor Oakland Museum of California company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Corning Museum of Glass company nor Oakland Museum of California company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Corning Museum of Glass company nor Oakland Museum of California company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Oakland Museum of California company nor Corning Museum of Glass company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Oakland Museum of California nor Corning Museum of Glass holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Oakland Museum of California company nor Corning Museum of Glass company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Corning Museum of Glass company employs more people globally than Oakland Museum of California company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Oakland Museum of California nor Corning Museum of Glass holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Oakland Museum of California nor Corning Museum of Glass holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Oakland Museum of California nor Corning Museum of Glass holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Oakland Museum of California nor Corning Museum of Glass holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Oakland Museum of California nor Corning Museum of Glass holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Oakland Museum of California nor Corning Museum of Glass holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models (LLMs). Prior to 0.11.1, vllm has a critical remote code execution vector in a config class named Nemotron_Nano_VL_Config. When vllm loads a model config that contains an auto_map entry, the config class resolves that mapping with get_class_from_dynamic_module(...) and immediately instantiates the returned class. This fetches and executes Python from the remote repository referenced in the auto_map string. Crucially, this happens even when the caller explicitly sets trust_remote_code=False in vllm.transformers_utils.config.get_config. In practice, an attacker can publish a benign-looking frontend repo whose config.json points via auto_map to a separate malicious backend repo; loading the frontend will silently run the backend’s code on the victim host. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.11.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

fastify-reply-from is a Fastify plugin to forward the current HTTP request to another server. Prior to 12.5.0, by crafting a malicious URL, an attacker could access routes that are not allowed, even though the reply.from is defined for specific routes in @fastify/reply-from. This vulnerability is fixed in 12.5.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17, A Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability has been identified in the Angular Template Compiler. It occurs because the compiler's internal security schema is incomplete, allowing attackers to bypass Angular's built-in security sanitization. Specifically, the schema fails to classify certain URL-holding attributes (e.g., those that could contain javascript: URLs) as requiring strict URL security, enabling the injection of malicious scripts. This vulnerability is fixed in 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Gin-vue-admin is a backstage management system based on vue and gin. In 2.8.6 and earlier, attackers can delete any file on the server at will, causing damage or unavailability of server resources. Attackers can control the 'FileMd5' parameter to delete any file and folder.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Portkey.ai Gateway is a blazing fast AI Gateway with integrated guardrails. Prior to 1.14.0, the gateway determined the destination baseURL by prioritizing the value in the x-portkey-custom-host request header. The proxy route then appends the client-specified path to perform an external fetch. This can be maliciously used by users for SSRF attacks. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.14.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X