Comparison Overview

Oman Cement Company S.A.O.G

VS

Sidhu Associates

Oman Cement Company S.A.O.G

Al Misfah, Oman Muscat, Muscat 112, OO
Last Update: 2025-11-22
Between 750 and 799

Since 1983, Oman Cement Company has symbolized Oman's drive for self-reliance in core industries. We Have given new strength to the construction industry, consolidated the nation's efforts for infrastructure development and created resources to achieve self-sufficiency. With a manufacturing facility operating on world class ISO 9001 certified quality management system and ISO 14001 for environment, our products meet global standards in performance and quality and reflect OCC's enduring commitment to customer satisfaction and a stronger foundation for tomorrow

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 501-1,000
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Sidhu Associates

11350 McCormick Road, Hunt Valley, MD, 21031, US
Last Update: 2025-11-23
Between 750 and 799

Sidhu Associates has been providing MEP consulting engineering services since 1977. Capabilities include design and construction management for HVAC, boilers, chilled water, plumbing, fire protection, high and medium voltage electrical distribution, traction power, fire detection, interior/exterior lighting, security, CCTV, environmental services and IT services. We are a Minority Business Enterprise (MBE).

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 34
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/omancementco.jpeg
Oman Cement Company S.A.O.G
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sidhu-associates.jpeg
Sidhu Associates
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Oman Cement Company S.A.O.G
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Sidhu Associates
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Oman Cement Company S.A.O.G in 2025.

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Sidhu Associates in 2025.

Incident History — Oman Cement Company S.A.O.G (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Oman Cement Company S.A.O.G cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Sidhu Associates (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sidhu Associates cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/omancementco.jpeg
Oman Cement Company S.A.O.G
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sidhu-associates.jpeg
Sidhu Associates
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Sidhu Associates company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Oman Cement Company S.A.O.G company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Sidhu Associates company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Oman Cement Company S.A.O.G company.

In the current year, Sidhu Associates company and Oman Cement Company S.A.O.G company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Sidhu Associates company nor Oman Cement Company S.A.O.G company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Sidhu Associates company nor Oman Cement Company S.A.O.G company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Sidhu Associates company nor Oman Cement Company S.A.O.G company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Oman Cement Company S.A.O.G company nor Sidhu Associates company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Oman Cement Company S.A.O.G nor Sidhu Associates holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Oman Cement Company S.A.O.G company nor Sidhu Associates company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Neither Oman Cement Company S.A.O.G nor Sidhu Associates holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Oman Cement Company S.A.O.G nor Sidhu Associates holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Oman Cement Company S.A.O.G nor Sidhu Associates holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Oman Cement Company S.A.O.G nor Sidhu Associates holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Oman Cement Company S.A.O.G nor Sidhu Associates holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Oman Cement Company S.A.O.G nor Sidhu Associates holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H