Comparison Overview

Omaha Print

VS

Paperwork UK

Omaha Print

4700 F Street, Omaha, NE, 68117, US
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 750 and 799

Omaha Print came from humble beginnings. Established in 1858 when Nebraska was still a territory and Omaha was just a small town on the west shore of the Missouri River, it managed to survive and prosper. Today, we try to emulate the courage of those early pioneers as we forge ahead and flourish in difficult times. History shows us that together with our clients, we are stronger and can accomplish more than we ever imagined. Our success through the years has been the result of our ability to adapt to new situations, and our pledge to help customers control costs by efficiently producing, distributing and managing their marketing materials. Mission: Recognizing opportunities every day to help our customers exceed their goals

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 16
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Paperwork UK

Victoria Road, Skegness, PE25 3SN, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-10
Between 750 and 799

Deal with the label experts for a quality product that meets your demands. Manufactured in the UK, using ethically sourced and sustainable raw materials, we make labels you can rely on. Call or email our sales and support team and you’ll speak to label experts with representatives countrywide. Free label audits guarantee savings from a vast array of off-the-shelf products or custom solutions. Trading for over 60 years, our manufacturing facility in Lincolnshire has become uniquely versatile. Combining a robust tooling library and state of the art machinery, the plant is at the forefront of new innovations and improving efficiency and sustainability in print. Safety comes from scale, and boasting 19 print and converting machines ensures products arrive on time, to the highest standard. Our two latest acquisitions are from the Bobst M-line range. Utilising the latest digitally automated print and die cutting controls we can reduce make-ready and waste, while increasing print speed and guaranteeing quality. All of our materials are sourced from internationally acclaimed companies so we can provide customers with fully compliant labels which meet stringent legislation across all sectors from food to pharmaceutical. Our in-house materials expert is on hand to advise on enquiries with samples available. If you give us an example of your product and tell us about the environment it is subjected to, we will find a label that’s compatible. Paperwork strives to offer a complete labelling solution through our partnerships with market leading printer and applicator manufacturers. Our labels are not only compatible with machines such as Zebra and Bizerba, but we also stock and supply a range of printers, applicators, spares and ancillaries – complete with service and care packages.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 8
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/omaha-print.jpeg
Omaha Print
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/paperworkukprint.jpeg
Paperwork UK
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Omaha Print
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Paperwork UK
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Omaha Print in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Paperwork UK in 2025.

Incident History — Omaha Print (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Omaha Print cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Paperwork UK (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Paperwork UK cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/omaha-print.jpeg
Omaha Print
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/paperworkukprint.jpeg
Paperwork UK
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Paperwork UK company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Omaha Print company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Paperwork UK company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Omaha Print company.

In the current year, Paperwork UK company and Omaha Print company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Paperwork UK company nor Omaha Print company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Paperwork UK company nor Omaha Print company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Paperwork UK company nor Omaha Print company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Omaha Print company nor Paperwork UK company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Omaha Print nor Paperwork UK holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Omaha Print company nor Paperwork UK company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Omaha Print company employs more people globally than Paperwork UK company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Omaha Print nor Paperwork UK holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Omaha Print nor Paperwork UK holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Omaha Print nor Paperwork UK holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Omaha Print nor Paperwork UK holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Omaha Print nor Paperwork UK holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Omaha Print nor Paperwork UK holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N