Comparison Overview

Omaha Print

VS

Metcalf Design & Printing Center

Omaha Print

4700 F Street, Omaha, NE, 68117, US
Last Update: 2025-12-11
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.omahaprint.com

Omaha Print came from humble beginnings. Established in 1858 when Nebraska was still a territory and Omaha was just a small town on the west shore of the Missouri River, it managed to survive and prosper. Today, we try to emulate the courage of those early pioneers as we forge ahead and flourish in difficult times. History shows us that together with our clients, we are stronger and can accomplish more than we ever imagined. Our success through the years has been the result of our ability to adapt to new situations, and our pledge to help customers control costs by efficiently producing, distributing and managing their marketing materials. Mission: Recognizing opportunities every day to help our customers exceed their goals

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 16
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Metcalf Design & Printing Center

264 Agler Road, Gahanna, 43230, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799
http://www.metcalfprinting.com

Since 1982 we’ve been helping our clients with a wide range of projects. Turns out, we’ve become friends with most of them as well. Why? Well, we get to know our clients, not just their printing projects. We take time to understand their needs. Time to understand what makes a project successful for them and their company. We take pride in our printing, let us take pride in yours.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 5
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/omaha-print.jpeg
Omaha Print
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/metcalf-design-&-printing-center.jpeg
Metcalf Design & Printing Center
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Omaha Print
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Metcalf Design & Printing Center
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Omaha Print in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Metcalf Design & Printing Center in 2025.

Incident History — Omaha Print (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Omaha Print cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Metcalf Design & Printing Center (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Metcalf Design & Printing Center cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/omaha-print.jpeg
Omaha Print
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/metcalf-design-&-printing-center.jpeg
Metcalf Design & Printing Center
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Metcalf Design & Printing Center company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Omaha Print company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Metcalf Design & Printing Center company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Omaha Print company.

In the current year, Metcalf Design & Printing Center company and Omaha Print company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Metcalf Design & Printing Center company nor Omaha Print company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Metcalf Design & Printing Center company nor Omaha Print company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Metcalf Design & Printing Center company nor Omaha Print company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Omaha Print company nor Metcalf Design & Printing Center company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Omaha Print nor Metcalf Design & Printing Center holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Omaha Print company nor Metcalf Design & Printing Center company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Omaha Print company employs more people globally than Metcalf Design & Printing Center company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Omaha Print nor Metcalf Design & Printing Center holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Omaha Print nor Metcalf Design & Printing Center holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Omaha Print nor Metcalf Design & Printing Center holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Omaha Print nor Metcalf Design & Printing Center holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Omaha Print nor Metcalf Design & Printing Center holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Omaha Print nor Metcalf Design & Printing Center holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References