Comparison Overview

Omaha Children's Museum

VS

Whitney Museum of American Art

Omaha Children's Museum

500 S 20th St, Omaha, Nebraska, 68102, US
Last Update: 2026-01-21
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.ocm.org

Omaha Children's Museum is in the top 15% of children's museums nationally. The museum features over 45,000 square feet of exhibit space, with permanent exhibits including: Charlie Campbell Science & Technology Center Art Smart Center Tinker Factory Imagination Playground (early childhood area) Fantastic Future Me Walker Tire & Auto Service Center Grass Patch Sandy's Splish Splash Garden In addition to its permanent exhibits, Omaha Children's Museum offers educational programs, traveling exhibitions, field trips, outreach programs, rentals, summer camps and birthday parties.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 47
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Whitney Museum of American Art

99 Gansevoort Street, New York, New York, 10014, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799
http://www.whitney.org

The Whitney seeks to be the defining museum of 20th- and 21st-century American art. The Museum collects, exhibits, preserves, researches, and interprets art of the United States in the broadest global, historical and interdisciplinary contexts. As the preeminent advocate for American art, we foster the work of living artists at critical moments in their careers. The Whitney educates a diverse public through direct interaction with artists, often before their work has achieved general acceptance. See the latest job and internship postings on our website here: https://whitney.org/about/job-postings

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 505
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/omaha-children's-museum.jpeg
Omaha Children's Museum
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/whitney-museum-of-american-art.jpeg
Whitney Museum of American Art
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Omaha Children's Museum
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Whitney Museum of American Art
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Omaha Children's Museum in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Whitney Museum of American Art in 2026.

Incident History — Omaha Children's Museum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Omaha Children's Museum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Whitney Museum of American Art (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Whitney Museum of American Art cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/omaha-children's-museum.jpeg
Omaha Children's Museum
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/whitney-museum-of-american-art.jpeg
Whitney Museum of American Art
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Whitney Museum of American Art company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Omaha Children's Museum company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Whitney Museum of American Art company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Omaha Children's Museum company.

In the current year, Whitney Museum of American Art company and Omaha Children's Museum company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Whitney Museum of American Art company nor Omaha Children's Museum company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Whitney Museum of American Art company nor Omaha Children's Museum company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Whitney Museum of American Art company nor Omaha Children's Museum company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Omaha Children's Museum company nor Whitney Museum of American Art company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Omaha Children's Museum nor Whitney Museum of American Art holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Omaha Children's Museum company nor Whitney Museum of American Art company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Whitney Museum of American Art company employs more people globally than Omaha Children's Museum company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Omaha Children's Museum nor Whitney Museum of American Art holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Omaha Children's Museum nor Whitney Museum of American Art holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Omaha Children's Museum nor Whitney Museum of American Art holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Omaha Children's Museum nor Whitney Museum of American Art holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Omaha Children's Museum nor Whitney Museum of American Art holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Omaha Children's Museum nor Whitney Museum of American Art holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References