Comparison Overview

OM Graphic Design

VS

AD82

OM Graphic Design

45 Carriage Oaks Dr SW, Marietta, 30064, US
Last Update: 2025-12-03
Between 700 and 749

OM Graphic Design, LLC's design skills extend across the full spectrum of graphics and identity, products, exhibitions, advertising, digital. OM Graphic Design, LLC has an extensive client list including: CNN en Espanol, Dana Augustine, Communities in School of Georgia, Communities in School Atlanta,The Performance Diference, Principal Construction, St. Catherine of Siena Catholic School, Intexzona, Interpark, etc.

NAICS: 54143
NAICS Definition: Graphic Design Services
Employees: 4
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

AD82

Androsdreef 92 Utrecht, Nederland 3562XC, NL
Last Update: 2025-12-02
Between 750 and 799

Na mijn studie Communication & Multimedia Design ben ik zo'n 7 jaar als designer werkzaam geweest bij diverse bureau's. In deze periode heb ik veel ervaring opgedaan op het gebied van grafisch ontwerp, webdesign en e-mailmarketing. Na deze leerzame jaren waarin ik aan mooie projecten heb mogen werken heb ik besloten een nieuwe uitdaging aan te gaan, vanaf 2015 ben ik gestart als ZZP'er! Een nieuwe huisstijl tot een volledige werkende website? Het behoort allemaal tot de mogelijkheden. Voor vragen of opmerkingen, neem gerust contact met mij op.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/om-graphic-design-llc.jpeg
OM Graphic Design
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ad82.jpeg
AD82
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
OM Graphic Design
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
AD82
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for OM Graphic Design in 2025.

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for AD82 in 2025.

Incident History — OM Graphic Design (X = Date, Y = Severity)

OM Graphic Design cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — AD82 (X = Date, Y = Severity)

AD82 cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/om-graphic-design-llc.jpeg
OM Graphic Design
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ad82.jpeg
AD82
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

AD82 company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to OM Graphic Design company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, AD82 company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to OM Graphic Design company.

In the current year, AD82 company and OM Graphic Design company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither AD82 company nor OM Graphic Design company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither AD82 company nor OM Graphic Design company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither AD82 company nor OM Graphic Design company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither OM Graphic Design company nor AD82 company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither OM Graphic Design nor AD82 holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither OM Graphic Design company nor AD82 company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

OM Graphic Design company employs more people globally than AD82 company, reflecting its scale as a Graphic Design.

Neither OM Graphic Design nor AD82 holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither OM Graphic Design nor AD82 holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither OM Graphic Design nor AD82 holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither OM Graphic Design nor AD82 holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither OM Graphic Design nor AD82 holds HIPAA certification.

Neither OM Graphic Design nor AD82 holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ImageMagick is free and open-source software used for editing and manipulating digital images. Prior to 7.1.2-9 and 6.9.13-34, there is a vulnerability in ImageMagick’s Magick++ layer that manifests when Options::fontFamily is invoked with an empty string. Clearing a font family calls RelinquishMagickMemory on _drawInfo->font, freeing the font string but leaving _drawInfo->font pointing to freed memory while _drawInfo->family is set to that (now-invalid) pointer. Any later cleanup or reuse of _drawInfo->font re-frees or dereferences dangling memory. DestroyDrawInfo and other setters (Options::font, Image::font) assume _drawInfo->font remains valid, so destruction or subsequent updates trigger crashes or heap corruption. This vulnerability is fixed in 7.1.2-9 and 6.9.13-34.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
Description

FeehiCMS version 2.1.1 has a Remote Code Execution via Unrestricted File Upload in Ad Management. FeehiCMS version 2.1.1 allows authenticated remote attackers to upload files that the server later executes (or stores in an executable location) without sufficient validation, sanitization, or execution restrictions. An authenticated remote attacker can upload a crafted PHP file and cause the application or web server to execute it, resulting in remote code execution (RCE).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

PHPGurukul Billing System 1.0 is vulnerable to SQL Injection in the admin/index.php endpoint. Specifically, the username parameter accepts unvalidated user input, which is then concatenated directly into a backend SQL query.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

NMIS/BioDose software V22.02 and previous versions contain executable binaries with plain text hard-coded passwords. These hard-coded passwords could allow unauthorized access to both the application and database.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L
cvss4
Base: 8.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

NMIS/BioDose V22.02 and previous versions' installation directory paths by default have insecure file permissions, which in certain deployment scenarios can enable users on client workstations to modify the program executables and libraries.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 7.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X