Comparison Overview

Olympus Corporation of the Americas

VS

Stryker

Olympus Corporation of the Americas

3500 Corporate Parkway, None, Center Valley, Pennsylvania, US, 18034-0610
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 700 and 749

At Olympus, we are committed to Our Purpose of making people’s lives healthier, safer and more fulfilling. As a global medical technology company, we partner with healthcare professionals to provide best-in-class solutions and services for early detection, diagnosis and minimally invasive treatment, aiming to improve patient outcomes by elevating the standard of care in targeted disease states. For more than 100 years, Olympus has pursued a goal of contributing to society by producing products designed with the purpose of delivering optimal outcomes for its customers around the world. Olympus Corporation of the Americas, a wholly owned subsidiary of Olympus Corporation, is headquartered in Center Valley, Pennsylvania, USA, and employs more than 4,500 employees throughout locations in North and South America.

NAICS: 3391
NAICS Definition: Medical Equipment and Supplies Manufacturing
Employees: 5,032
Subsidiaries: 3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
3

Stryker

2825 Airview Boulevard, Kalamazoo, MI, US, 49002
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 800 and 849

Stryker is a global leader in medical technologies and, together with our customers, we are driven to make healthcare better. We offer innovative products and services in MedSurg, Neurotechnology and Orthopaedics that help improve patient and healthcare outcomes. Alongside its customers around the world, Stryker impacts more than 150 million patients annually. More information is available at stryker.com and careers.stryker.com. Facts: ● 2024 Sales: $22.6 billion ● Industry: Medical Instruments & Supplies ● Employees: 53,000 worldwide ● 40 years of sales growth leading up to 2020 ● 44+ Manufacturing and R&D Locations Worldwide ● $1.5 billion spent on research and development in 2024 ● ~14,200 patents owned globally in 2024 ● Products sold in ~75 countries ● Fortune 500 Company ● 7 consecutive years as one of Fortune's World's Best Workplaces Stryker’s social media community guidelines: https://www.stryker.com/content/m/legal/social-media-community-guidelines/en/index.html Notice Regarding Employee Conduct on Facebook/LinkedIn Meta/LinkedIn does not permit employers to verify or validate “employees” in the (META: “Works at” LinkedIn: “Experience”) section of users’ profiles. Please be aware that the views expressed by individuals on their personal accounts and do not necessarily represent the views of our company. If you encounter any issues with a person claiming to be our employee, we recommend using the “Report Profile” feature. If you’d like to report concerns to our Ethics Hotline, you may do so at: https://app.convercent.com/en-us/LandingPage/b6bb4e84-9fcb-ea11-a974-000d3ab9f296

NAICS: 3391
NAICS Definition: Medical Equipment and Supplies Manufacturing
Employees: 46,799
Subsidiaries: 39
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/olympus.jpeg
Olympus Corporation of the Americas
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/stryker.jpeg
Stryker
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Olympus Corporation of the Americas
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Stryker
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Medical Equipment Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Olympus Corporation of the Americas in 2025.

Incidents vs Medical Equipment Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Stryker in 2025.

Incident History — Olympus Corporation of the Americas (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Olympus Corporation of the Americas cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Stryker (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Stryker cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/olympus.jpeg
Olympus Corporation of the Americas
Incidents

Date Detected: 10/2021
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unauthorized Access
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 10/2021
Type:Cyber Attack
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 09/2021
Type:Ransomware
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/stryker.jpeg
Stryker
Incidents

Date Detected: 5/2024
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unauthorized Access
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Stryker company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Olympus Corporation of the Americas company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Olympus Corporation of the Americas company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to Stryker company.

In the current year, Stryker company and Olympus Corporation of the Americas company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Olympus Corporation of the Americas company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Stryker company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Both Stryker company and Olympus Corporation of the Americas company have disclosed experiencing at least one data breach.

Olympus Corporation of the Americas company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Stryker company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Olympus Corporation of the Americas company nor Stryker company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Olympus Corporation of the Americas nor Stryker holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Stryker company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Olympus Corporation of the Americas company.

Stryker company employs more people globally than Olympus Corporation of the Americas company, reflecting its scale as a Medical Equipment Manufacturing.

Neither Olympus Corporation of the Americas nor Stryker holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Olympus Corporation of the Americas nor Stryker holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Olympus Corporation of the Americas nor Stryker holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Olympus Corporation of the Americas nor Stryker holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Olympus Corporation of the Americas nor Stryker holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Olympus Corporation of the Americas nor Stryker holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Sigstore Timestamp Authority is a service for issuing RFC 3161 timestamps. Prior to 2.0.3, Function api.ParseJSONRequest currently splits (via a call to strings.Split) an optionally-provided OID (which is untrusted data) on periods. Similarly, function api.getContentType splits the Content-Type header (which is also untrusted data) on an application string. As a result, in the face of a malicious request with either an excessively long OID in the payload containing many period characters or a malformed Content-Type header, a call to api.ParseJSONRequest or api.getContentType incurs allocations of O(n) bytes (where n stands for the length of the function's argument). This vulnerability is fixed in 2.0.3.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Monkeytype is a minimalistic and customizable typing test. In 25.49.0 and earlier, there is improper handling of user input which allows an attacker to execute malicious javascript on anyone viewing a malicious quote submission. quote.text and quote.source are user input, and they're inserted straight into the DOM. If they contain HTML tags, they will be rendered (after some escaping using quotes and textarea tags).

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

SysReptor is a fully customizable pentest reporting platform. Prior to 2025.102, there is a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability allows authenticated users to execute malicious JavaScript in the context of other logged-in users by uploading malicious JavaScript files in the web UI. This vulnerability is fixed in 2025.102.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Taiko Alethia is an Ethereum-equivalent, permissionless, based rollup designed to scale Ethereum without compromising its fundamental properties. In 2.3.1 and earlier, TaikoInbox._verifyBatches (packages/protocol/contracts/layer1/based/TaikoInbox.sol:627-678) advanced the local tid to whatever transition matched the current blockHash before knowing whether that batch would actually be verified. When the loop later broke (e.g., cooldown window not yet passed or transition invalidated), the function still wrote that newer tid into batches[lastVerifiedBatchId].verifiedTransitionId after decrementing batchId. Result: the last verified batch could end up pointing at a transition index from the next batch (often zeroed), corrupting the verified chain pointer.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A flaw has been found in youlaitech youlai-mall 1.0.0/2.0.0. Affected is the function getById/updateAddress/deleteAddress of the file /mall-ums/app-api/v1/addresses/. Executing manipulation can lead to improper control of dynamically-identified variables. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit has been published and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X