Comparison Overview

Olson & Olson, LLP

VS

Law Partners Personal Injury Lawyers

Olson & Olson, LLP

2727 Allen Parkway, Suite 600, Houston, Texas 77019, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

All of the lawyers at Olson & Olson concentrate their practice in the representation of cities, counties, special districts, and other units of local government. The firm has worked to develop and maintain special expertise in its representation in these areas by hiring lawyers with significant experience in local government law. Lawyers with the firm have served in the past as City Attorney for the cities of Houston, Waco, Beaumont, Baytown, and Huntsville. Others have served as assistant city attorneys and department heads in municipal legal departments. The firm’s lawyers are active in professional organizations in the area of local government law, including the International Municipal Lawyers Association, the American Bar Association Section of State and Local Government Law, the Texas City Attorney’s Association, the Government Liability Committee of the Defense Research Institute, and the State Bar of Texas’ Government Lawyers Section and Property Tax Committee. Olson & Olson has been voted “Best Law Firm” in Houston by U.S. News – Best Lawyers for Municipal Litigation and Municipal Law for 2009-2010, 2010-2011 and 2011-2012 .

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 83
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Law Partners Personal Injury Lawyers

Level 45, 2 Park Street, Sydney, NSW, 2000, AU
Last Update: 2025-11-28

Law Partners is Australia’s largest specialist injury firm and winner of the Lawyer Monthly Personal Injury Law Firm of the Year award. We ask more questions and get to know you personally. It’s how we spot the things others don’t, so you get more compensation. For more information, or for free, no obligation advice about your claim call us on 131515 or visit our website.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 183
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/olson-&-olson-llp.jpeg
Olson & Olson, LLP
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/law-partners.jpeg
Law Partners Personal Injury Lawyers
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Olson & Olson, LLP
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Law Partners Personal Injury Lawyers
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Olson & Olson, LLP in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Law Partners Personal Injury Lawyers in 2025.

Incident History — Olson & Olson, LLP (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Olson & Olson, LLP cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Law Partners Personal Injury Lawyers (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Law Partners Personal Injury Lawyers cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/olson-&-olson-llp.jpeg
Olson & Olson, LLP
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/law-partners.jpeg
Law Partners Personal Injury Lawyers
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Olson & Olson, LLP company and Law Partners Personal Injury Lawyers company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Law Partners Personal Injury Lawyers company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Olson & Olson, LLP company.

In the current year, Law Partners Personal Injury Lawyers company and Olson & Olson, LLP company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Law Partners Personal Injury Lawyers company nor Olson & Olson, LLP company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Law Partners Personal Injury Lawyers company nor Olson & Olson, LLP company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Law Partners Personal Injury Lawyers company nor Olson & Olson, LLP company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Olson & Olson, LLP company nor Law Partners Personal Injury Lawyers company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Olson & Olson, LLP nor Law Partners Personal Injury Lawyers holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Olson & Olson, LLP company nor Law Partners Personal Injury Lawyers company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Law Partners Personal Injury Lawyers company employs more people globally than Olson & Olson, LLP company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Olson & Olson, LLP nor Law Partners Personal Injury Lawyers holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Olson & Olson, LLP nor Law Partners Personal Injury Lawyers holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Olson & Olson, LLP nor Law Partners Personal Injury Lawyers holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Olson & Olson, LLP nor Law Partners Personal Injury Lawyers holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Olson & Olson, LLP nor Law Partners Personal Injury Lawyers holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Olson & Olson, LLP nor Law Partners Personal Injury Lawyers holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X