Comparison Overview

Olive Law Group, PLLC

VS

Wayfind

Olive Law Group, PLLC

2500 Regency Parkway, Cary, NC, 27518, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Olive Law Group is an intellectual property and business law firm that has served its clients in the Triangle for over 10 years. We represent corporations, universities, entrepreneurs, and individuals and are dedicated to providing high-quality legal services through significant personal interaction with our clients. We offer a full range of intellectual property services to meet our clients'​ needs with attorneys who are experienced in many areas of practice, including patents, trademarks, copyrights, and trade secrets. At Olive Law Group, we strive to help our clients discern how their intellectual property and technology can best be used to successfully achieve their business goals and objectives.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 3
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Wayfind

P.O. Box 2134, Seattle, WA 98111, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Wayfind volunteer attorneys provide free legal services to nonprofits and microenterprises and we provide legal trainings to attorneys and community orgs. Mission Wayfind improves the quality of life in Washington communities by providing access to free business legal services for nonprofits and microenterprises. Wayfind Services: -- Wayfind connects nonprofit organizations with attorneys for pro bono (at no charge) legal services. -- Wayfind hosts a microenterprise legal clinics in Seattle, Edmonds and Federal Way. Wayfind volunteer lawyers meet with low-income microenterprise entrepreneurs to spot legal issues and counsel them on legal issues and responsibilities with respect to their microenterprise business venture. -- Wayfind offers continuing legal education training (CLE) for attorneys and workshops for nonprofits on legal issues commonly facing nonprofits and microenterprise businesses.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 5
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/olivelawgroup.jpeg
Olive Law Group, PLLC
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/wayfind.jpeg
Wayfind
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Olive Law Group, PLLC
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Wayfind
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Olive Law Group, PLLC in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Wayfind in 2025.

Incident History — Olive Law Group, PLLC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Olive Law Group, PLLC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Wayfind (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Wayfind cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/olivelawgroup.jpeg
Olive Law Group, PLLC
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/wayfind.jpeg
Wayfind
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Olive Law Group, PLLC company and Wayfind company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Wayfind company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Olive Law Group, PLLC company.

In the current year, Wayfind company and Olive Law Group, PLLC company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Wayfind company nor Olive Law Group, PLLC company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Wayfind company nor Olive Law Group, PLLC company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Wayfind company nor Olive Law Group, PLLC company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Olive Law Group, PLLC company nor Wayfind company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Olive Law Group, PLLC nor Wayfind holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Olive Law Group, PLLC company nor Wayfind company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Wayfind company employs more people globally than Olive Law Group, PLLC company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Olive Law Group, PLLC nor Wayfind holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Olive Law Group, PLLC nor Wayfind holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Olive Law Group, PLLC nor Wayfind holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Olive Law Group, PLLC nor Wayfind holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Olive Law Group, PLLC nor Wayfind holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Olive Law Group, PLLC nor Wayfind holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X