Comparison Overview

Old Bridgewater Historical Society

VS

South Bend Museum of Art

Old Bridgewater Historical Society

162 Howard St, West Bridgewater, 02379, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22

The Old Bridgewater Historical Society was founded in 1894 and incorporated in 1895 for the purposes of promoting education and research relating to the original township of Bridgewater, its inhabitants, and its history by collecting, preserving, exhibiting, and interpreting materials, artifacts, and information pertaining to “Old Bridgewater”. This area today encompasses the towns of Bridgewater, East Bridgewater, West Bridgewater, and Brockton (formerly North Bridgewater). The Society has regular open hours to assist members and visitors alike with genealogical and historical information, and hosts monthly events that are often free to the community. They own and operate the historic colonial home of Rev. James Keith, built in 1662 and thought to be the oldest remaining parsonage in the United States. They have an active Board of Directors, and maintain a large collection of texts, manuscripts, documents, and artifacts pertaining the history of the four towns it serves. The Society is a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization and is operated by volunteers.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: None
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

South Bend Museum of Art

120 S. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd, South Bend, IN, US, 46601
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799

Founded in 1947, the South Bend Museum of Art is the premier cultural destination for the community, providing insight into the art, history and culture of the region. SBMA celebrates 75 years in 2022, with a new outlook for growth, and a refreshed vision for the future. Conceived by a local teacher, Carlotta Banta in her bequest to the city, the South Bend Art Association was created through efforts of local leaders and originally established in the carriage house of the Studebaker mansion. The founding collection of works by Indiana artists was donated by Mr. and Mrs. E. M. Morris. In the early 1970s, the museum, the city, and the arts council combined efforts to create the new Century Center on the banks of the St. Joseph River in downtown South Bend. SBMA occupies 6000 square feet on three levels in the northern wing of the building. The reinvisioned SBMA was accredited in 1987 by the American Alliance of Museums; that accreditation was renewed in 1999 and 2011. SBMA is a world-class arts institution with deep roots in the community through exhibitions, programs, and studio arts classes. The brand identity tagline of See, Belong, Make, Art (SBMA) reinforces the museum’s commitment to displaying and creating art with inclusiveness and accessibility as cornerstones of its work. The collection is rich in regional art, from the nineteenth century to the present, and has long engaged with contemporary artists from Indiana, Illinois, Michigan, Minnesota, and Missouri. The museum puts on several major exhibitions every year. SBMA has fostered generations of emerging and established artists of all ages in it's art studios for ceramic, weaving, painting, photography and more.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 27
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/old-bridgewater-historical-society.jpeg
Old Bridgewater Historical Society
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/south-bend-museum-of-art.jpeg
South Bend Museum of Art
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Old Bridgewater Historical Society
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
South Bend Museum of Art
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Old Bridgewater Historical Society in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for South Bend Museum of Art in 2026.

Incident History — Old Bridgewater Historical Society (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Old Bridgewater Historical Society cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — South Bend Museum of Art (X = Date, Y = Severity)

South Bend Museum of Art cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/old-bridgewater-historical-society.jpeg
Old Bridgewater Historical Society
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/south-bend-museum-of-art.jpeg
South Bend Museum of Art
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Old Bridgewater Historical Society company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to South Bend Museum of Art company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, South Bend Museum of Art company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Old Bridgewater Historical Society company.

In the current year, South Bend Museum of Art company and Old Bridgewater Historical Society company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither South Bend Museum of Art company nor Old Bridgewater Historical Society company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither South Bend Museum of Art company nor Old Bridgewater Historical Society company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither South Bend Museum of Art company nor Old Bridgewater Historical Society company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Old Bridgewater Historical Society company nor South Bend Museum of Art company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Old Bridgewater Historical Society nor South Bend Museum of Art holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Old Bridgewater Historical Society company nor South Bend Museum of Art company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Neither Old Bridgewater Historical Society nor South Bend Museum of Art holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Old Bridgewater Historical Society nor South Bend Museum of Art holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Old Bridgewater Historical Society nor South Bend Museum of Art holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Old Bridgewater Historical Society nor South Bend Museum of Art holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Old Bridgewater Historical Society nor South Bend Museum of Art holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Old Bridgewater Historical Society nor South Bend Museum of Art holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N