Comparison Overview

Oil Industries’ Commissioning and Operation Company (OICO)

VS

YPF

Oil Industries’ Commissioning and Operation Company (OICO)

No. 11, East Qobadian St., Nelson Mandela (Africa) Blvd, Tehran, Tehran, undefined, IR
Last Update: 2025-03-09 (UTC)
View Profile
Between 700 and 749
https://www.oico.ir

Oil Industries’ Commissioning and Operation Company (OICO) is incorporated to manage and execute commissioning and start-up, operation, maintenance and professional training for oil, gas and petrochemical industries. OICO was established in 2011 as a private joint stock company in Tehran, Iran; which is a subsidiary of Oil Industries Engineering and construction group (OIEC group). As a commissioning and start-up pioneer, OICO successfully commissioned mega projects such as South Pars Gas Field Development Phased 9&10 (Feed: 2000MMCFD) and Sirri NGL (Feed: 140MMCFD). Currently, OICO is involved in South Pars Gas Field Development Phases 12 (Feed: 3000MMCFD), 17&18 (Feed: 3000MMCFD) and 20&21 (Feed: 3000MMCFD). OICO is considered as the first private company which has operated a plant (Sirri NGL) in Iran.

NAICS: 211
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 960
Subsidiaries: 2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

YPF

Macacha Guemes 515, Capital Federal, Buenos Aires, ., AR
Last Update: 2025-03-05 (UTC)
Between 750 and 799
http://www.ypf.com

En YPF, tenemos un Plan 4x4 para convertirnos en una compañía de clase mundial y lograr transformarnos en grandes exportadores de hidrocarburos. Nuestros cuatro pilares son: la aceleración de la producción de petróleo en Vaca Muerta, el activo más importante que tiene nuestro país; la disciplina financiera en la gestión de inversiones; la búsqueda de las eficiencias operativas en los negocios, y la concreción del proyecto de GNL en Argentina. Invertimos en grandes proyectos de producción y exploración, transformación energética, industrialización y en el desarrollo de ductos para transportar la producción. Trabajamos por los combustibles del futuro y de calidad internacional. Buscamos constantemente innovación y nuevas tecnologías. Ponemos mucho esfuerzo para multiplicar nuestro potencial energético y seguir desarrollando la industria. Energía a la altura de tu energía. #YPFENERGÍAARGENTINA.

NAICS: 211
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 27,131
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/oil-industries’-commissioning-and-operation-company-oico-.jpeg
Oil Industries’ Commissioning and Operation Company (OICO)
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ypf-s-a-.jpeg
YPF
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Oil Industries’ Commissioning and Operation Company (OICO)
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
YPF
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Oil and Gas Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Oil Industries’ Commissioning and Operation Company (OICO) in 2025.

Incidents vs Oil and Gas Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for YPF in 2025.

Incident History — Oil Industries’ Commissioning and Operation Company (OICO) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Oil Industries’ Commissioning and Operation Company (OICO) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — YPF (X = Date, Y = Severity)

YPF cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/oil-industries’-commissioning-and-operation-company-oico-.jpeg
Oil Industries’ Commissioning and Operation Company (OICO)
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ypf-s-a-.jpeg
YPF
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

YPF company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Oil Industries’ Commissioning and Operation Company (OICO) company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, YPF company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Oil Industries’ Commissioning and Operation Company (OICO) company.

In the current year, YPF company and Oil Industries’ Commissioning and Operation Company (OICO) company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither YPF company nor Oil Industries’ Commissioning and Operation Company (OICO) company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither YPF company nor Oil Industries’ Commissioning and Operation Company (OICO) company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither YPF company nor Oil Industries’ Commissioning and Operation Company (OICO) company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Oil Industries’ Commissioning and Operation Company (OICO) company nor YPF company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Oil Industries’ Commissioning and Operation Company (OICO) nor YPF holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Oil Industries’ Commissioning and Operation Company (OICO) company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to YPF company.

YPF company employs more people globally than Oil Industries’ Commissioning and Operation Company (OICO) company, reflecting its scale as a Oil and Gas.

Neither Oil Industries’ Commissioning and Operation Company (OICO) nor YPF holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Oil Industries’ Commissioning and Operation Company (OICO) nor YPF holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Oil Industries’ Commissioning and Operation Company (OICO) nor YPF holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Oil Industries’ Commissioning and Operation Company (OICO) nor YPF holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Oil Industries’ Commissioning and Operation Company (OICO) nor YPF holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Oil Industries’ Commissioning and Operation Company (OICO) nor YPF holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

The Bold Page Builder plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the ‘percentage’ parameter in all versions up to, and including, 5.4.5 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Contributor-level access and above, to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page.

Published
Date
2025-10-23
Updated
Date
2025-10-23
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
References
Description

The ComboServlet in Liferay Portal 7.4.0 through 7.4.3.111, and older unsupported versions, and Liferay DXP 2023.Q4.0 through 2023.Q4.2, 2023.Q3.1 through 2023.Q3.5, 7.4 GA through update 92, 7.3 GA through update 35, and older unsupported versions does not limit the number or size of the files it will combine, which allows remote attackers to create very large responses that lead to a denial of service attack via the URL query string.

Published
Date
2025-10-23
Updated
Date
2025-10-23
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

A relative path traversal vulnerability was discovered in Productivity Suite software version 4.4.1.19. The vulnerability allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to interact with the ProductivityService PLC simulator and delete arbitrary directories on the target machine.

Published
Date
2025-10-23
Updated
Date
2025-10-23
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

A relative path traversal vulnerability was discovered in Productivity Suite software version 4.4.1.19. The vulnerability allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to interact with the ProductivityService PLC simulator and create arbitrary directories on the target machine.

Published
Date
2025-10-23
Updated
Date
2025-10-23
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

A relative path traversal vulnerability was discovered in Productivity Suite software version 4.4.1.19. The vulnerability allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to interact with the ProductivityService PLC simulator and delete arbitrary files on the target machine.

Published
Date
2025-10-23
Updated
Date
2025-10-23
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:H
cvss4
Base: 8.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:H/SC:N/SI:L/SA:L/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References