Comparison Overview

Oil Industries’ Commissioning and Operation Company (OICO)

VS

NOV

Oil Industries’ Commissioning and Operation Company (OICO)

No. 11, East Qobadian St., Nelson Mandela (Africa) Blvd, Tehran, Tehran, undefined, IR
Last Update: 2025-03-09 (UTC)
Between 700 and 749

Oil Industries’ Commissioning and Operation Company (OICO) is incorporated to manage and execute commissioning and start-up, operation, maintenance and professional training for oil, gas and petrochemical industries. OICO was established in 2011 as a private joint stock company in Tehran, Iran; which is a subsidiary of Oil Industries Engineering and construction group (OIEC group). As a commissioning and start-up pioneer, OICO successfully commissioned mega projects such as South Pars Gas Field Development Phased 9&10 (Feed: 2000MMCFD) and Sirri NGL (Feed: 140MMCFD). Currently, OICO is involved in South Pars Gas Field Development Phases 12 (Feed: 3000MMCFD), 17&18 (Feed: 3000MMCFD) and 20&21 (Feed: 3000MMCFD). OICO is considered as the first private company which has operated a plant (Sirri NGL) in Iran.

NAICS: 211
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 960
Subsidiaries: 2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

NOV

10353 Richmond Ave, Houston, Texas, 77042, US
Last Update: 2025-05-06 (UTC)
Between 750 and 799

NOV delivers technology-driven solutions to empower the global energy industry. For more than 150 years, NOV has pioneered innovations that enable its customers to safely produce abundant energy while minimizing environmental impact. The energy industry depends on NOV’s deep expertise and technology to continually improve oilfield operations and assist in efforts to advance the energy transition towards a more sustainable future. NOV powers the industry that powers the world.

NAICS: 211
NAICS Definition: Oil and Gas Extraction
Employees: 34,809
Subsidiaries: 21
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/oil-industries’-commissioning-and-operation-company-oico-.jpeg
Oil Industries’ Commissioning and Operation Company (OICO)
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/national-oilwell-varco.jpeg
NOV
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Oil Industries’ Commissioning and Operation Company (OICO)
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
NOV
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Oil and Gas Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Oil Industries’ Commissioning and Operation Company (OICO) in 2025.

Incidents vs Oil and Gas Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for NOV in 2025.

Incident History — Oil Industries’ Commissioning and Operation Company (OICO) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Oil Industries’ Commissioning and Operation Company (OICO) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — NOV (X = Date, Y = Severity)

NOV cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/oil-industries’-commissioning-and-operation-company-oico-.jpeg
Oil Industries’ Commissioning and Operation Company (OICO)
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/national-oilwell-varco.jpeg
NOV
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

NOV company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Oil Industries’ Commissioning and Operation Company (OICO) company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, NOV company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Oil Industries’ Commissioning and Operation Company (OICO) company.

In the current year, NOV company and Oil Industries’ Commissioning and Operation Company (OICO) company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither NOV company nor Oil Industries’ Commissioning and Operation Company (OICO) company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither NOV company nor Oil Industries’ Commissioning and Operation Company (OICO) company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither NOV company nor Oil Industries’ Commissioning and Operation Company (OICO) company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Oil Industries’ Commissioning and Operation Company (OICO) company nor NOV company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Oil Industries’ Commissioning and Operation Company (OICO) nor NOV holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

NOV company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Oil Industries’ Commissioning and Operation Company (OICO) company.

NOV company employs more people globally than Oil Industries’ Commissioning and Operation Company (OICO) company, reflecting its scale as a Oil and Gas.

Neither Oil Industries’ Commissioning and Operation Company (OICO) nor NOV holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Oil Industries’ Commissioning and Operation Company (OICO) nor NOV holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Oil Industries’ Commissioning and Operation Company (OICO) nor NOV holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Oil Industries’ Commissioning and Operation Company (OICO) nor NOV holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Oil Industries’ Commissioning and Operation Company (OICO) nor NOV holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Oil Industries’ Commissioning and Operation Company (OICO) nor NOV holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

The Bold Page Builder plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the ‘percentage’ parameter in all versions up to, and including, 5.4.5 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Contributor-level access and above, to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

The ComboServlet in Liferay Portal 7.4.0 through 7.4.3.111, and older unsupported versions, and Liferay DXP 2023.Q4.0 through 2023.Q4.2, 2023.Q3.1 through 2023.Q3.5, 7.4 GA through update 92, 7.3 GA through update 35, and older unsupported versions does not limit the number or size of the files it will combine, which allows remote attackers to create very large responses that lead to a denial of service attack via the URL query string.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A relative path traversal vulnerability was discovered in Productivity Suite software version 4.4.1.19. The vulnerability allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to interact with the ProductivityService PLC simulator and delete arbitrary directories on the target machine.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A relative path traversal vulnerability was discovered in Productivity Suite software version 4.4.1.19. The vulnerability allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to interact with the ProductivityService PLC simulator and create arbitrary directories on the target machine.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A relative path traversal vulnerability was discovered in Productivity Suite software version 4.4.1.19. The vulnerability allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to interact with the ProductivityService PLC simulator and delete arbitrary files on the target machine.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:H
cvss4
Base: 8.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:H/SC:N/SI:L/SA:L/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X