Comparison Overview

Ohr-O'Keefe Museum of Art

VS

Bozar

Ohr-O'Keefe Museum of Art

386 BEACH BLVD, BILOXI, 39530, US
Last Update: 2025-12-03
Between 750 and 799

The mission of the Ohr-O’Keefe Museum of Art is to promote and preserve the unique legacy of Biloxi potter George E. Ohr and the diverse cultural heritage of the Mississippi Gulf Coast; and to exhibit works which exemplify the independent, innovative, and creative spirit of George Ohr, emancipated craftsman Pleasant Reed, and Ohr-O’Keefe Museum architect Frank Gehry. This mission is served through compelling exhibitions and educational experiences viewed from a fresh perspective relevant to our community, the region, and the nation with a strong focus on ceramic arts.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 10
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Bozar

Rue Ravenstein 23, Bruxelles, 1000, BE
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799

Bozar, the Centre for Fine Arts’ cultural project, offers a dynamic and diversified cultural programme of concerts and exhibitions: a multidisciplinary approach in which debates, theatre, cinema, literature and other disciplines meet to reflect on the connections between art and society. — The Centre for Fine Arts aims to be a European cultural centre, anchored in the 21st century, with a novel and innovative view of society, a laboratory of ideas attuned to society’s current and future challenges. In the coming decade, Bozar aims to embody change, and contribute to seven major and evolving societal challenges. Sitting atop Coudenberg Hill, monumental and yet discreet, the Brussels Centre for Fine Arts is Belgium’s major cultural venue. In 1913, Queen Elisabeth and King Albert I expressed their desire to build “a temple devoted to Music and the Arts”. Designed by renowned Belgian architect Victor Horta (1861-1947), construction began after the First World War. Upon returning from his stay in the United States, Horta abandoned his flamboyant, industrial Art Nouveau style for the more monumental and geometric language of Art Deco. Inaugurated in 1928, the Centre for Fine Arts is a testimony to this aesthetic revolution. For nearly a century, the centre has hosted the art world’s crème de la crème, and it is where most of Bozar’s cultural and artistic activities are held.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 328
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ohr-o'keefe-museum-of-art.jpeg
Ohr-O'Keefe Museum of Art
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bozar.jpeg
Bozar
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Ohr-O'Keefe Museum of Art
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Bozar
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Ohr-O'Keefe Museum of Art in 2025.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Bozar in 2025.

Incident History — Ohr-O'Keefe Museum of Art (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ohr-O'Keefe Museum of Art cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Bozar (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bozar cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ohr-o'keefe-museum-of-art.jpeg
Ohr-O'Keefe Museum of Art
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bozar.jpeg
Bozar
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Bozar company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Ohr-O'Keefe Museum of Art company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Bozar company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Ohr-O'Keefe Museum of Art company.

In the current year, Bozar company and Ohr-O'Keefe Museum of Art company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Bozar company nor Ohr-O'Keefe Museum of Art company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Bozar company nor Ohr-O'Keefe Museum of Art company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Bozar company nor Ohr-O'Keefe Museum of Art company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Ohr-O'Keefe Museum of Art company nor Bozar company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Ohr-O'Keefe Museum of Art nor Bozar holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Ohr-O'Keefe Museum of Art company nor Bozar company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Bozar company employs more people globally than Ohr-O'Keefe Museum of Art company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Ohr-O'Keefe Museum of Art nor Bozar holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Ohr-O'Keefe Museum of Art nor Bozar holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Ohr-O'Keefe Museum of Art nor Bozar holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Ohr-O'Keefe Museum of Art nor Bozar holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Ohr-O'Keefe Museum of Art nor Bozar holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Ohr-O'Keefe Museum of Art nor Bozar holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ImageMagick is free and open-source software used for editing and manipulating digital images. Prior to 7.1.2-9 and 6.9.13-34, there is a vulnerability in ImageMagick’s Magick++ layer that manifests when Options::fontFamily is invoked with an empty string. Clearing a font family calls RelinquishMagickMemory on _drawInfo->font, freeing the font string but leaving _drawInfo->font pointing to freed memory while _drawInfo->family is set to that (now-invalid) pointer. Any later cleanup or reuse of _drawInfo->font re-frees or dereferences dangling memory. DestroyDrawInfo and other setters (Options::font, Image::font) assume _drawInfo->font remains valid, so destruction or subsequent updates trigger crashes or heap corruption. This vulnerability is fixed in 7.1.2-9 and 6.9.13-34.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
Description

FeehiCMS version 2.1.1 has a Remote Code Execution via Unrestricted File Upload in Ad Management. FeehiCMS version 2.1.1 allows authenticated remote attackers to upload files that the server later executes (or stores in an executable location) without sufficient validation, sanitization, or execution restrictions. An authenticated remote attacker can upload a crafted PHP file and cause the application or web server to execute it, resulting in remote code execution (RCE).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

PHPGurukul Billing System 1.0 is vulnerable to SQL Injection in the admin/index.php endpoint. Specifically, the username parameter accepts unvalidated user input, which is then concatenated directly into a backend SQL query.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

NMIS/BioDose software V22.02 and previous versions contain executable binaries with plain text hard-coded passwords. These hard-coded passwords could allow unauthorized access to both the application and database.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L
cvss4
Base: 8.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

NMIS/BioDose V22.02 and previous versions' installation directory paths by default have insecure file permissions, which in certain deployment scenarios can enable users on client workstations to modify the program executables and libraries.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 7.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X