Comparison Overview

Ohr-O'Keefe Museum of Art

VS

Shaw Centre for the Salish Sea

Ohr-O'Keefe Museum of Art

386 BEACH BLVD, BILOXI, 39530, US
Last Update: 2025-12-03
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.georgeohr.org

The mission of the Ohr-O’Keefe Museum of Art is to promote and preserve the unique legacy of Biloxi potter George E. Ohr and the diverse cultural heritage of the Mississippi Gulf Coast; and to exhibit works which exemplify the independent, innovative, and creative spirit of George Ohr, emancipated craftsman Pleasant Reed, and Ohr-O’Keefe Museum architect Frank Gehry. This mission is served through compelling exhibitions and educational experiences viewed from a fresh perspective relevant to our community, the region, and the nation with a strong focus on ceramic arts.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 10
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Shaw Centre for the Salish Sea

9811 Seaport Pl, Sidney, British Columbia, V8L 4X3, CA
Last Update: 2025-12-03
Between 750 and 799
http://www.salishseacentre.org

Visit Canada's community aquarium and learning centre for the Salish Sea. Experience 160 species of marine life, a marine mammal artifact exhibit, and an inspirational Coast Salish art collection. Connect with our Oceaneers, learn about, explore and conserve our Salish Sea Bioregion – its wildlife, waters, land, culture, and people. As a not-for-profit community organization, the Shaw Centre for the Salish Sea connects the public with the Salish Sea Bioregion and its ecosystems through engagement, knowledge and awareness. This one-of-a-kind aquarium and cultural centre offers an interactive, informative and hands-on experience with the Salish Sea through self-guided visits, daily programs, group and school bookings, and special events and lectures.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 24
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ohr-o'keefe-museum-of-art.jpeg
Ohr-O'Keefe Museum of Art
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/shaw-ocean-discovery-centre.jpeg
Shaw Centre for the Salish Sea
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Ohr-O'Keefe Museum of Art
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Shaw Centre for the Salish Sea
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Ohr-O'Keefe Museum of Art in 2025.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Shaw Centre for the Salish Sea in 2025.

Incident History — Ohr-O'Keefe Museum of Art (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ohr-O'Keefe Museum of Art cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Shaw Centre for the Salish Sea (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Shaw Centre for the Salish Sea cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ohr-o'keefe-museum-of-art.jpeg
Ohr-O'Keefe Museum of Art
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/shaw-ocean-discovery-centre.jpeg
Shaw Centre for the Salish Sea
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Ohr-O'Keefe Museum of Art company and Shaw Centre for the Salish Sea company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Shaw Centre for the Salish Sea company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Ohr-O'Keefe Museum of Art company.

In the current year, Shaw Centre for the Salish Sea company and Ohr-O'Keefe Museum of Art company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Shaw Centre for the Salish Sea company nor Ohr-O'Keefe Museum of Art company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Shaw Centre for the Salish Sea company nor Ohr-O'Keefe Museum of Art company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Shaw Centre for the Salish Sea company nor Ohr-O'Keefe Museum of Art company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Ohr-O'Keefe Museum of Art company nor Shaw Centre for the Salish Sea company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Ohr-O'Keefe Museum of Art nor Shaw Centre for the Salish Sea holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Ohr-O'Keefe Museum of Art company nor Shaw Centre for the Salish Sea company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Shaw Centre for the Salish Sea company employs more people globally than Ohr-O'Keefe Museum of Art company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Ohr-O'Keefe Museum of Art nor Shaw Centre for the Salish Sea holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Ohr-O'Keefe Museum of Art nor Shaw Centre for the Salish Sea holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Ohr-O'Keefe Museum of Art nor Shaw Centre for the Salish Sea holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Ohr-O'Keefe Museum of Art nor Shaw Centre for the Salish Sea holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Ohr-O'Keefe Museum of Art nor Shaw Centre for the Salish Sea holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Ohr-O'Keefe Museum of Art nor Shaw Centre for the Salish Sea holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ImageMagick is free and open-source software used for editing and manipulating digital images. Prior to 7.1.2-9 and 6.9.13-34, there is a vulnerability in ImageMagick’s Magick++ layer that manifests when Options::fontFamily is invoked with an empty string. Clearing a font family calls RelinquishMagickMemory on _drawInfo->font, freeing the font string but leaving _drawInfo->font pointing to freed memory while _drawInfo->family is set to that (now-invalid) pointer. Any later cleanup or reuse of _drawInfo->font re-frees or dereferences dangling memory. DestroyDrawInfo and other setters (Options::font, Image::font) assume _drawInfo->font remains valid, so destruction or subsequent updates trigger crashes or heap corruption. This vulnerability is fixed in 7.1.2-9 and 6.9.13-34.

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
References
Description

FeehiCMS version 2.1.1 has a Remote Code Execution via Unrestricted File Upload in Ad Management. FeehiCMS version 2.1.1 allows authenticated remote attackers to upload files that the server later executes (or stores in an executable location) without sufficient validation, sanitization, or execution restrictions. An authenticated remote attacker can upload a crafted PHP file and cause the application or web server to execute it, resulting in remote code execution (RCE).

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
References
Description

PHPGurukul Billing System 1.0 is vulnerable to SQL Injection in the admin/index.php endpoint. Specifically, the username parameter accepts unvalidated user input, which is then concatenated directly into a backend SQL query.

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
References
Description

NMIS/BioDose software V22.02 and previous versions contain executable binaries with plain text hard-coded passwords. These hard-coded passwords could allow unauthorized access to both the application and database.

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L
cvss4
Base: 8.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

NMIS/BioDose V22.02 and previous versions' installation directory paths by default have insecure file permissions, which in certain deployment scenarios can enable users on client workstations to modify the program executables and libraries.

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 7.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References