Comparison Overview

OhioHealth

VS

UCLA Health

OhioHealth

3430 OhioHealth Parkway, Columbus, Ohio, US, 43202
Last Update: 2025-12-09
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.ohiohealth.com

OhioHealth is a nationally recognized, not-for-profit, faith-based health system of more than 35,000 associates, providers and volunteers. We lead with our mission to improve the health of those we serve throughout our 16 hospitals and 200+ urgent, primary and specialty care sites spanning 50 Ohio counties. Headquartered in Columbus, Ohio, we’re proud to be consistently recognized by FORTUNE as one of the “100 Best Companies to Work For” and rated a Top Hospital & Health System by Fair360 in 2024.

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 14,532
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

UCLA Health

757 Westwood Plaza, Los Angeles, 90095, US
Last Update: 2025-12-10
Between 700 and 749
https://uclahealth.org

For more than half a century, UCLA Health has provided the best in healthcare and the latest in medical technology to the people of Los Angeles and throughout the world. Comprised of Ronald Reagan UCLA Medical Center, UCLA Medical Center Santa Monica, Resnick Neuropsychiatric Hospital at UCLA, UCLA Mattel Children's Hospital, UCLA West Valley Medical Center and the UCLA Medical Group with its wide-reaching system of primary-care and specialty-care offices throughout the region, UCLA Health is among the most comprehensive and advanced healthcare systems in the world. Our physicians are world leaders in the diagnosis and treatment of complex illnesses, and our hospitals are among the best in the country. Consistently ranked one of the top ten hospitals in the nation and the best medical center in the western United States by U.S. News & World Report, Ronald Reagan UCLA Medical Center is at the cutting edge of biomedical research, and our doctors and scientists are leaders in performing pioneering work across an astounding range of disciplines, from organ transplantation and cardiac surgery to neurosurgery and cancer treatment, and bringing the latest discoveries to virtually every field of medicine.

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 17,400
Subsidiaries: 50
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
13
Attack type number
3

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ohiohealth.jpeg
OhioHealth
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ucla-health.jpeg
UCLA Health
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
OhioHealth
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
UCLA Health
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for OhioHealth in 2025.

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for UCLA Health in 2025.

Incident History — OhioHealth (X = Date, Y = Severity)

OhioHealth cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — UCLA Health (X = Date, Y = Severity)

UCLA Health cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ohiohealth.jpeg
OhioHealth
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ucla-health.jpeg
UCLA Health
Incidents

Date Detected: 12/2024
Type:Ransomware
Motivation: Financial Gain
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 1/2024
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Phishing
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 10/2023
Type:Ransomware
Motivation: Financial Gain
Blog: Blog

FAQ

OhioHealth company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to UCLA Health company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

UCLA Health company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas OhioHealth company has not reported any.

In the current year, UCLA Health company and OhioHealth company have not reported any cyber incidents.

UCLA Health company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while OhioHealth company has not reported such incidents publicly.

UCLA Health company has disclosed at least one data breach, while OhioHealth company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither UCLA Health company nor OhioHealth company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither OhioHealth company nor UCLA Health company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither OhioHealth nor UCLA Health holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

UCLA Health company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to OhioHealth company.

UCLA Health company employs more people globally than OhioHealth company, reflecting its scale as a Hospitals and Health Care.

Neither OhioHealth nor UCLA Health holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither OhioHealth nor UCLA Health holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither OhioHealth nor UCLA Health holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither OhioHealth nor UCLA Health holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither OhioHealth nor UCLA Health holds HIPAA certification.

Neither OhioHealth nor UCLA Health holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References