Comparison Overview

OhioHealth

VS

RWJBarnabas Health

OhioHealth

3430 OhioHealth Parkway, Columbus, Ohio, US, 43202
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799

OhioHealth is a nationally recognized, not-for-profit, faith-based health system of more than 35,000 associates, providers and volunteers. We lead with our mission to improve the health of those we serve throughout our 16 hospitals and 200+ urgent, primary and specialty care sites spanning 50 Ohio counties. Headquartered in Columbus, Ohio, we’re proud to be consistently recognized by FORTUNE as one of the “100 Best Companies to Work For” and rated a Top Hospital & Health System by Fair360 in 2024.

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 14,532
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

RWJBarnabas Health

95 Old Short Hills Rd, West Orange, 07052, US
Last Update: 2025-12-09

RWJBarnabas Health is New Jersey’s largest and most comprehensive academic health system, caring for more than 5 million people annually. Nationally renowned for quality and safety, the system includes 14 hospitals and 9,000 affiliated physicians integrated to provide care at more than 700 patient care locations. RWJBarnabas Health is among New Jersey’s largest private employers, with more than 44,000 employees, contributing more than $5.5 billion to the state economy every year. RWJBarnabas Health partners with its diverse communities to build and sustain a healthier New Jersey. It provides patient-centered care in a compassionate and equitable manner. RWJBarnabas Health’s commitment to enhancing access to care includes a transformative partnership with Rutgers University, including the Rutgers Cancer Institute — the state's only NCI-designated Comprehensive Cancer Center - and Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School.

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 24,556
Subsidiaries: 28
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ohiohealth.jpeg
OhioHealth
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rwjbarnabashealth.jpeg
RWJBarnabas Health
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
OhioHealth
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
RWJBarnabas Health
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for OhioHealth in 2025.

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for RWJBarnabas Health in 2025.

Incident History — OhioHealth (X = Date, Y = Severity)

OhioHealth cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — RWJBarnabas Health (X = Date, Y = Severity)

RWJBarnabas Health cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ohiohealth.jpeg
OhioHealth
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rwjbarnabashealth.jpeg
RWJBarnabas Health
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

RWJBarnabas Health company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to OhioHealth company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, RWJBarnabas Health company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to OhioHealth company.

In the current year, RWJBarnabas Health company and OhioHealth company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither RWJBarnabas Health company nor OhioHealth company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither RWJBarnabas Health company nor OhioHealth company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither RWJBarnabas Health company nor OhioHealth company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither OhioHealth company nor RWJBarnabas Health company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither OhioHealth nor RWJBarnabas Health holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

RWJBarnabas Health company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to OhioHealth company.

RWJBarnabas Health company employs more people globally than OhioHealth company, reflecting its scale as a Hospitals and Health Care.

Neither OhioHealth nor RWJBarnabas Health holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither OhioHealth nor RWJBarnabas Health holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither OhioHealth nor RWJBarnabas Health holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither OhioHealth nor RWJBarnabas Health holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither OhioHealth nor RWJBarnabas Health holds HIPAA certification.

Neither OhioHealth nor RWJBarnabas Health holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N