Comparison Overview

Ogilvy

VS

TBWA\Worldwide

Ogilvy

175 Greenwich St, New York, NY, US, 10007
Last Update: 2026-01-25
Between 750 and 799

Ogilvy has been creating impact for brands through iconic, culture-changing, value-driving ideas since the company was founded by David Ogilvy 75 years ago. We build on that rich legacy through Borderless Creativity – innovating at the intersections of its advertising, public relations, relationship design, consulting, and health capabilities with experts collaborating seamlessly across over 120 offices in nearly 90 countries. We are proud to currently rank as the #1 global agency network for creative excellence and effectiveness by WARC, signifying our ability to deliver creative solutions that drive unreasonable impact for clients and communities.

NAICS: 541613
NAICS Definition: Marketing Consulting Services
Employees: 11,136
Subsidiaries: 53
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

TBWA\Worldwide

220 E 42nd St, New York, 10017, US
Last Update: 2026-01-18
Between 750 and 799

TBWA is The Disruption Company®. We are a Collective of creative minds with an unlimited creative canvas. We create brand platforms that defy convention and compete with culture. Thanks to our trademarked Disruption® methodology, we build the world’s strongest brands. Brands that own an unfair share of the future. Named one of the World's Most Innovative Companies by Fast Company in 2025, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020 and 2019, TBWA is also Adweek's 2024, 2022, 2021 and 2018 Global Agency of the Year and AdAge’s A-List 2022 Network of the Year. Our Collective has 11,000+ creative minds in over 40 countries, and also includes brands such as Auditoire, Digital Arts Network (DAN), eg+ worldwide, GMR, TBWA\Media Arts Lab, TBWA\Health Collective and TRO. Global clients include adidas, Apple, Gatorade, Henkel, Hilton Hotels, McDonald's, Nissan and Singapore Airlines. TBWA is part of Omnicom Group (NYSE: OMC).

NAICS: 541613
NAICS Definition: Marketing Consulting Services
Employees: 11,394
Subsidiaries: 72
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ogilvy.jpeg
Ogilvy
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tbwa.jpeg
TBWA\Worldwide
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Ogilvy
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
TBWA\Worldwide
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Advertising Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Ogilvy in 2026.

Incidents vs Advertising Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for TBWA\Worldwide in 2026.

Incident History — Ogilvy (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ogilvy cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — TBWA\Worldwide (X = Date, Y = Severity)

TBWA\Worldwide cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ogilvy.jpeg
Ogilvy
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tbwa.jpeg
TBWA\Worldwide
Incidents

Date Detected: 4/2025
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Bluetooth Protocol
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Ogilvy company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to TBWA\Worldwide company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

TBWA\Worldwide company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Ogilvy company has not reported any.

In the current year, TBWA\Worldwide company and Ogilvy company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither TBWA\Worldwide company nor Ogilvy company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither TBWA\Worldwide company nor Ogilvy company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither TBWA\Worldwide company nor Ogilvy company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

TBWA\Worldwide company has disclosed at least one vulnerability, while Ogilvy company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Ogilvy nor TBWA\Worldwide holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

TBWA\Worldwide company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Ogilvy company.

TBWA\Worldwide company employs more people globally than Ogilvy company, reflecting its scale as a Advertising Services.

Neither Ogilvy nor TBWA\Worldwide holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Ogilvy nor TBWA\Worldwide holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Ogilvy nor TBWA\Worldwide holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Ogilvy nor TBWA\Worldwide holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Ogilvy nor TBWA\Worldwide holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Ogilvy nor TBWA\Worldwide holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Typemill is a flat-file, Markdown-based CMS designed for informational documentation websites. A reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) exists in the login error view template `login.twig` of versions 2.19.1 and below. The `username` value can be echoed back without proper contextual encoding when authentication fails. An attacker can execute script in the login page context. This issue has been fixed in version 2.19.2.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

A DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the DomainCheckerApp class within domain/script.js of Sourcecodester Domain Availability Checker v1.0. The vulnerability occurs because the application improperly handles user-supplied data in the createResultElement method by using the unsafe innerHTML property to render domain search results.

Description

A Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability exists in Sourcecodester Modern Image Gallery App v1.0 within the gallery/upload.php component. The application fails to properly validate uploaded file contents. Additionally, the application preserves the user-supplied file extension during the save process. This allows an unauthenticated attacker to upload arbitrary PHP code by spoofing the MIME type as an image, leading to full system compromise.

Description

A UNIX symbolic link following issue in the jailer component in Firecracker version v1.13.1 and earlier and 1.14.0 on Linux may allow a local host user with write access to the pre-created jailer directories to overwrite arbitrary host files via a symlink attack during the initialization copy at jailer startup, if the jailer is executed with root privileges. To mitigate this issue, users should upgrade to version v1.13.2 or 1.14.1 or above.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the /srvs/membersrv/getCashiers endpoint of the Aptsys gemscms backend platform thru 2025-05-28. This unauthenticated endpoint returns a list of cashier accounts, including names, email addresses, usernames, and passwords hashed using MD5. As MD5 is a broken cryptographic function, the hashes can be easily reversed using public tools, exposing user credentials in plaintext. This allows remote attackers to perform unauthorized logins and potentially gain access to sensitive POS operations or backend functions.