Comparison Overview

The Alamo

VS

Impression 5 Science Center

The Alamo

300 Alamo Plaza, San Antonio, Texas, US, 78209
Last Update: 2026-01-19
Between 750 and 799

Located in the heart of San Antonio, the Alamo stands as the Shrine of Texas Liberty. More than 1.6 million visitors travel to the site each year, making it the #1 most visited destination in the State of Texas. The 300-year history of the Alamo is world-renowned and represents the core of Texas’ identity today. In 1960, the Alamo was designated a United States National Historic Landmark, and in 2015, it became part of the Lone Star State's only UNESCO World Heritage Site. Witness living history, experience authentic artifacts, and explore an iconic landmark that shaped the country. Visit theAlamo.org.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 118
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Impression 5 Science Center

200 Museum Drive, LANSING, MI, 48933, US
Last Update: 2026-01-23
Between 750 and 799

Impression 5 Science Center is a dynamic, interactive space for families to play, create, and challenge their understanding of science. “Impression 5” refers to the five senses and the way each sense is engaged during your visit to the Science Center! Our mission is to facilitate learners in scientific exploration through hands-on exhibits and participatory educational programming. This hands-on learning environment opened in 1972 and serves over 120,000 families and visitors each year! Now conveniently located in downtown Lansing on Museum Drive and right off Lansing's River Trail, families and students have access to self-led learning opportunities that encourage risk taking, problem solving, and team building. In addition, accessibility is now an Impression 5 priority across the facility, exhibits, and educational programs. Following a full ADA accessibility survey, the building has been renovated to make parking, entrances, and restrooms accessible to individuals with mobility impairments, and the learning spaces—including Impression 5’s exhibit floor and classrooms—are barrier free. Within educational programs, accommodations for physical, developmental, and social needs are planned for and made on a regular basis so that all participants can gain access to personally relevant material and have a successful experience in a group or individual setting.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 29
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/officialalamo.jpeg
The Alamo
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/impression-5-science-center.jpeg
Impression 5 Science Center
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
The Alamo
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Impression 5 Science Center
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Alamo in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Impression 5 Science Center in 2026.

Incident History — The Alamo (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Alamo cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Impression 5 Science Center (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Impression 5 Science Center cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/officialalamo.jpeg
The Alamo
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/impression-5-science-center.jpeg
Impression 5 Science Center
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Impression 5 Science Center company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to The Alamo company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Impression 5 Science Center company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to The Alamo company.

In the current year, Impression 5 Science Center company and The Alamo company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Impression 5 Science Center company nor The Alamo company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Impression 5 Science Center company nor The Alamo company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Impression 5 Science Center company nor The Alamo company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither The Alamo company nor Impression 5 Science Center company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither The Alamo nor Impression 5 Science Center holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither The Alamo company nor Impression 5 Science Center company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

The Alamo company employs more people globally than Impression 5 Science Center company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither The Alamo nor Impression 5 Science Center holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither The Alamo nor Impression 5 Science Center holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither The Alamo nor Impression 5 Science Center holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither The Alamo nor Impression 5 Science Center holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither The Alamo nor Impression 5 Science Center holds HIPAA certification.

Neither The Alamo nor Impression 5 Science Center holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H