Comparison Overview

The Alamo

VS

American Police Hall of Fame & Museum

The Alamo

300 Alamo Plaza, San Antonio, Texas, US, 78209
Last Update: 2026-01-19
Between 750 and 799

Located in the heart of San Antonio, the Alamo stands as the Shrine of Texas Liberty. More than 1.6 million visitors travel to the site each year, making it the #1 most visited destination in the State of Texas. The 300-year history of the Alamo is world-renowned and represents the core of Texas’ identity today. In 1960, the Alamo was designated a United States National Historic Landmark, and in 2015, it became part of the Lone Star State's only UNESCO World Heritage Site. Witness living history, experience authentic artifacts, and explore an iconic landmark that shaped the country. Visit theAlamo.org.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 118
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

American Police Hall of Fame & Museum

6350 HORIZON DR, Titusville, Florida, us, 32780
Last Update: 2026-01-20
Between 750 and 799

The American Police Hall of Fame and Museum was the lifelong dream of founder, Gerald Arenberg. In 1955, Chief Arenberg was struck and severely injured by a drunk driver while on-duty directing traffic in suburban Golf, Illinois. From that time on, he dedicated his life to honoring those peace officers who made the ultimate sacrifice. The American Police Hall of Fame and Museum first opened in Northport, Florida in October 1960. After 30 years, the museum was moved to Miami, Florida and then in 2003 to its current location in Titusville, Florida. Through its supporting organizations, the American Federation of Police and Concerned Citizens and the National Association of Chiefs of Police, the American Police Hall of Fame and Museum has continually been a focal point for American law enforcement. From recognition of outstanding law enforcement officers, to promoting personal safety for children, the American Police Hall of Fame and Museum has been there. In 1987, the National Association of Chiefs of Police began conducting a survey of national police commanders. The results of this survey have been instrumental in making the needs of the local department heard on a national level. It was also discovered in the course of conducting these surveys that many departments do not have adequate funding for many basic crime fighting tools. For this reason, the National Association of Chiefs of Police added two programs to directly aid police departments. The first, begun in 1999, is the “Vests For Life” program. Through donations of vests and money, the National Association of Chiefs of Police was able to provide body armor to departments who requested them. This program was discontinued in 2007 when funding for vests became more widely available to departments. The second, begun in 2001, is the “K-9 Matching Gift Program”. This is a resource that provides funding for police K-9s to police departments that could not otherwise afford them combining local community support with matching funds from NACOP. Through December 31, 2007 NACOP had provided $551,222 to 57 departments in 23 states. In addition to a commitment to crime prevention and professional law enforcement, the National Association of Chiefs of Police and the American Federation of Police and Concerned Citizens are committed to the families of law enforcement officers. In 1995, the American Federation of Police and Concerned Citizens began providing financial aid for grief counseling and emergency assistance to the families of officers killed in the line of duty. Because of the generous support of donors, this program has continued to grow. Similarly, the National Association of Chiefs of Police began a program in 1997 to provide college scholarships to children of officers seriously injured in the line of duty. The mission of the American Police Hall of Fame & Museum is to promote and support the law enforcement profession.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 5
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/officialalamo.jpeg
The Alamo
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
American Police Hall of Fame & Museum
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
The Alamo
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
American Police Hall of Fame & Museum
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Alamo in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for American Police Hall of Fame & Museum in 2026.

Incident History — The Alamo (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Alamo cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — American Police Hall of Fame & Museum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

American Police Hall of Fame & Museum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/officialalamo.jpeg
The Alamo
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
American Police Hall of Fame & Museum
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

American Police Hall of Fame & Museum company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to The Alamo company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, American Police Hall of Fame & Museum company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to The Alamo company.

In the current year, American Police Hall of Fame & Museum company and The Alamo company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither American Police Hall of Fame & Museum company nor The Alamo company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither American Police Hall of Fame & Museum company nor The Alamo company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither American Police Hall of Fame & Museum company nor The Alamo company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither The Alamo company nor American Police Hall of Fame & Museum company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither The Alamo nor American Police Hall of Fame & Museum holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither The Alamo company nor American Police Hall of Fame & Museum company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

The Alamo company employs more people globally than American Police Hall of Fame & Museum company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither The Alamo nor American Police Hall of Fame & Museum holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither The Alamo nor American Police Hall of Fame & Museum holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither The Alamo nor American Police Hall of Fame & Museum holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither The Alamo nor American Police Hall of Fame & Museum holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither The Alamo nor American Police Hall of Fame & Museum holds HIPAA certification.

Neither The Alamo nor American Police Hall of Fame & Museum holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H