Comparison Overview

OfficeMax Australia

VS

Staples

OfficeMax Australia

undefined, Sydney, NSW, 2020, AU
Last Update: 2025-05-06 (UTC)
Between 900 and 1000

Excellent

OfficeMax and Winc have come together to form a single source supplier for everything your workplace needs to work. Visit our Winc Australia LinkedIn page to learn more.

NAICS: 45321
NAICS Definition: Office Supplies and Stationery Stores
Employees: 116
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Staples

500 Staples Drive, Framingham, MA, 01702, US
Last Update: 2025-05-06 (UTC)

Excellent

At Staples, Business is Human, which means our people โ€˜think beyond the algorithmโ€™ to deliver for customers. A leader in workspace products and solutions for over 35 years, Staples has thousands of experts dedicated to applying their intuition, expertise, and experience to bring out the best that technology such as AI has to offer. These experts make work easier, smarter, and more efficient for businesses of all sizes. The company operates in North America through eCommerce and direct sales and is headquartered near Boston, Massachusetts. More information about Staples is available at www.staplesadvantage.com. This page supports Staplesโ€™ eCommerce and direct sales business and careers. For news or positions related to Staplesยฎ stores, visit the Staples Stores page.

NAICS: 45321
NAICS Definition: Office Supplies and Stationery Stores
Employees: 30,352
Subsidiaries: 4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
2

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/officemax-australia.jpeg
OfficeMax Australia
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/staples.jpeg
Staples
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
Compliance Summary
OfficeMax Australia
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Staples
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Retail Office Equipment Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for OfficeMax Australia in 2025.

Incidents vs Retail Office Equipment Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Staples in 2025.

Incident History โ€” OfficeMax Australia (X = Date, Y = Severity)

OfficeMax Australia cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History โ€” Staples (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Staples cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/officemax-australia.jpeg
OfficeMax Australia
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/staples.jpeg
Staples
Incidents

Date Detected: 11/2023
Type:Cyber Attack
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 8/2014
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unauthorized Access
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Both OfficeMax Australia company and Staples company demonstrate a comparable AI risk posture, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Staples company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas OfficeMax Australia company has not reported any.

In the current year, Staples company and OfficeMax Australia company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Staples company nor OfficeMax Australia company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Staples company has disclosed at least one data breach, while OfficeMax Australia company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Staples company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while OfficeMax Australia company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither OfficeMax Australia company nor Staples company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Staples company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to OfficeMax Australia company.

Staples company employs more people globally than OfficeMax Australia company, reflecting its scale as a Retail Office Equipment.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

An issue was discovered in chinabugotech hutool before 5.8.4 allowing attackers to execute arbitrary expressions that lead to arbitrary method invocation and potentially remote code execution (RCE) via the QLExpressEngine class.

Description

A weakness has been identified in JeecgBoot up to 3.8.2. The impacted element is an unknown function of the file /sys/role/exportXls. This manipulation causes improper authorization. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be exploited. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 4.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A security flaw has been discovered in JeecgBoot up to 3.8.2. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /sys/user/exportXls of the component Filter Handler. The manipulation results in improper authorization. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit has been released to the public and may be exploited. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 4.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A vulnerability was identified in JeecgBoot up to 3.8.2. Impacted is an unknown function of the file /sys/tenant/deleteBatch. The manipulation of the argument ids leads to improper authorization. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. The complexity of an attack is rather high. The exploitability is considered difficult. The exploit is publicly available and might be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 2.1
Severity: HIGH
AV:N/AC:H/Au:S/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 3.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 2.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A vulnerability was determined in JeecgBoot up to 3.8.2. This issue affects some unknown processing of the file /api/getDepartUserList. Executing manipulation of the argument departId can lead to improper authorization. The attack can be executed remotely. This attack is characterized by high complexity. The exploitability is assessed as difficult. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 2.1
Severity: HIGH
AV:N/AC:H/Au:S/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 3.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 2.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X