Comparison Overview

Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada/Commissariat à la protection de la vie privée du Canada

VS

City of Framingham

Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada/Commissariat à la protection de la vie privée du Canada

Gatineau, CA
Last Update: 2025-11-22
Between 650 and 699

The Privacy Commissioner of Canada is an Officer of Parliament, mandated to protect and promote privacy rights. The Office of the Privacy Commissioner (OPC) hosts a page on LinkedIn to communicate with people about future career opportunities at the OPC, to offer privacy tips and guidance to small businesses to increase their awareness of, and therefore compliance with, PIPEDA, and to share important announcements. Privacy notice: https://www.priv.gc.ca/en/privacy-and-transparency-at-the-opc/social-media-policies-notices/#_LinkedIn Comment policy: https://www.priv.gc.ca/en/privacy-and-transparency-at-the-opc/social-media-policies-notices/#_Comment About the OPC: https://www.priv.gc.ca/en/about-the-opc/ ********* Le commissaire à la protection de la vie privée du Canada est un haut fonctionnaire du Parlement qui a pour mandat de protéger le droit des personnes à la vie privée et d'en faire la promotion. Le Commissariat à la protection de la vie privée du Canada a créé une page sur LinkedIn pour faire connaître les possibilités de carrière au sein de l’organisation, offrir des conseils et des orientations en matière de protection de la vie privée aux petites entreprises pour accroître leur sensibilisation au droit à la vie privée et les aider à se conformer à la LPRPDE, ainsi que partager des annonces importantes. Avis de confidentialité : https://www.priv.gc.ca/fr/protection-de-la-vie-privee-et-transparence-au-commissariat/medias-sociaux-politiques-avis/#_LinkedIn Politiques relatives aux commentaires : https://www.priv.gc.ca/fr/protection-de-la-vie-privee-et-transparence-au-commissariat/medias-sociaux-politiques-avis/#_Comment À propos du Commissariat : https://www.priv.gc.ca/fr/a-propos-du-commissariat/

NAICS: 92
NAICS Definition: Public Administration
Employees: 173
Subsidiaries: 59
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
5
Attack type number
3

City of Framingham

150 Concord Street Framingham, MA 01702, US
Last Update: 2025-11-22
Between 750 and 799

OVERVIEW Framingham was incorporated as a town on June 25, 1700. Chapter 143 of the Acts of 1949 established the Town of Framingham Representative Town Government by Limited Town Meetings. The Citizens of Framingham adopted the Home Rule Charter for the City of Framingham at an election held on April 5, 2017. The benefits of local government outlined in the Home Rule Charter affirm the values of representative democracy, strong leadership, and citizen participation. On November 7, 2017 the citizens of Framingham elected the first Mayor, City Council and School Committee, who were sworn into office on January 1, 2018. EXECUTIVE & LEGISLATIVE BRANCHES The executive and administrative powers of the municipality are solely vested in the Mayor, and may be exercised by the Mayor either personally or through several municipal agencies under the general supervision and control of the Mayor. The Mayor shall enforce the charter, the laws, the ordinances and other orders of the municipality and record all official acts of the executive branch of City government. The Mayor shall exercise general supervision and direction over all municipal agencies, unless otherwise provided by law, by the charter or by ordinance. City Council is the sole legislative body of the City, and is therefore responsible for passing all City ordinances. The City Council is made up of eleven (11) members which shall exercise the legislative powers of Framingham. Two (2) of these members are known as councilors-at-large and nine (9) members are known as district councilors.

NAICS: 922
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 10,001
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/office-of-the-privacy-commissioner-of-canada.jpeg
Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada/Commissariat à la protection de la vie privée du Canada
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/city-of-framingham.jpeg
City of Framingham
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada/Commissariat à la protection de la vie privée du Canada
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
City of Framingham
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Average (This Year)

Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada/Commissariat à la protection de la vie privée du Canada has 53.85% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for City of Framingham in 2025.

Incident History — Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada/Commissariat à la protection de la vie privée du Canada (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada/Commissariat à la protection de la vie privée du Canada cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — City of Framingham (X = Date, Y = Severity)

City of Framingham cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/office-of-the-privacy-commissioner-of-canada.jpeg
Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada/Commissariat à la protection de la vie privée du Canada
Incidents

Date Detected: 10/2025
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 5/2025
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 10/2022
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unpatched and decommissioned server
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/city-of-framingham.jpeg
City of Framingham
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

City of Framingham company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada/Commissariat à la protection de la vie privée du Canada company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada/Commissariat à la protection de la vie privée du Canada company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas City of Framingham company has not reported any.

In the current year, Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada/Commissariat à la protection de la vie privée du Canada company has reported more cyber incidents than City of Framingham company.

Neither City of Framingham company nor Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada/Commissariat à la protection de la vie privée du Canada company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada/Commissariat à la protection de la vie privée du Canada company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other City of Framingham company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada/Commissariat à la protection de la vie privée du Canada company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while City of Framingham company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada/Commissariat à la protection de la vie privée du Canada company nor City of Framingham company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada/Commissariat à la protection de la vie privée du Canada nor City of Framingham holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada/Commissariat à la protection de la vie privée du Canada company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to City of Framingham company.

City of Framingham company employs more people globally than Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada/Commissariat à la protection de la vie privée du Canada company, reflecting its scale as a Government Administration.

Neither Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada/Commissariat à la protection de la vie privée du Canada nor City of Framingham holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada/Commissariat à la protection de la vie privée du Canada nor City of Framingham holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada/Commissariat à la protection de la vie privée du Canada nor City of Framingham holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada/Commissariat à la protection de la vie privée du Canada nor City of Framingham holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada/Commissariat à la protection de la vie privée du Canada nor City of Framingham holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada/Commissariat à la protection de la vie privée du Canada nor City of Framingham holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H