Comparison Overview

Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada/Commissariat à la protection de la vie privée du Canada

VS

Assurance Maladie

Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada/Commissariat à la protection de la vie privée du Canada

Gatineau, CA
Last Update: 2025-11-22
Between 650 and 699

The Privacy Commissioner of Canada is an Officer of Parliament, mandated to protect and promote privacy rights. The Office of the Privacy Commissioner (OPC) hosts a page on LinkedIn to communicate with people about future career opportunities at the OPC, to offer privacy tips and guidance to small businesses to increase their awareness of, and therefore compliance with, PIPEDA, and to share important announcements. Privacy notice: https://www.priv.gc.ca/en/privacy-and-transparency-at-the-opc/social-media-policies-notices/#_LinkedIn Comment policy: https://www.priv.gc.ca/en/privacy-and-transparency-at-the-opc/social-media-policies-notices/#_Comment About the OPC: https://www.priv.gc.ca/en/about-the-opc/ ********* Le commissaire à la protection de la vie privée du Canada est un haut fonctionnaire du Parlement qui a pour mandat de protéger le droit des personnes à la vie privée et d'en faire la promotion. Le Commissariat à la protection de la vie privée du Canada a créé une page sur LinkedIn pour faire connaître les possibilités de carrière au sein de l’organisation, offrir des conseils et des orientations en matière de protection de la vie privée aux petites entreprises pour accroître leur sensibilisation au droit à la vie privée et les aider à se conformer à la LPRPDE, ainsi que partager des annonces importantes. Avis de confidentialité : https://www.priv.gc.ca/fr/protection-de-la-vie-privee-et-transparence-au-commissariat/medias-sociaux-politiques-avis/#_LinkedIn Politiques relatives aux commentaires : https://www.priv.gc.ca/fr/protection-de-la-vie-privee-et-transparence-au-commissariat/medias-sociaux-politiques-avis/#_Comment À propos du Commissariat : https://www.priv.gc.ca/fr/a-propos-du-commissariat/

NAICS: 92
NAICS Definition: Public Administration
Employees: 173
Subsidiaries: 59
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
5
Attack type number
3

Assurance Maladie

Last Update: 2025-11-27

Travailler à l’Assurance Maladie, c’est donner une nouvelle dimension à votre métier et agir au quotidien pour la protection de notre système de santé. Participez à une grande diversité de projets dans un cadre bienveillant et soyez fier de contribuer à une mission essentielle : agir ensemble, protéger chacun. Depuis près de 80 ans, l'Assurance Maladie joue un rôle majeur au service de la solidarité nationale. Nous sommes convaincus que la clé de la pérennité du système de santé relève d'une responsabilité collective et réside dans l'implication forte de chacun de ses acteurs. Au sein de ce système, l'Assurance Maladie assume une triple mission : ⏺️ garantir un accès universel aux droits et permettre l'accès aux soins ⏺️ accompagner chacun dans la préservation de sa santé ⏺️ améliorer l'efficacité du système Toutes ses missions, l’Assurance Maladie les mène avec le souci d’assurer la meilleure qualité de service. Elle s’appuie pour cela sur un réseau de proximité qui couvre l’ensemble du territoire et l’engagement de plus de 80 000 collaborateurs qui agissent jour après jour à l’échelle départementale, régionale et nationale. Ensemble, au quotidien, ils font vivre ses valeurs d’universalité, de solidarité, de responsabilité et d’innovation.

NAICS: 92
NAICS Definition: Public Administration
Employees: 23,361
Subsidiaries: 112
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/office-of-the-privacy-commissioner-of-canada.jpeg
Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada/Commissariat à la protection de la vie privée du Canada
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/assurance-maladie.jpeg
Assurance Maladie
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada/Commissariat à la protection de la vie privée du Canada
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Assurance Maladie
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Average (This Year)

Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada/Commissariat à la protection de la vie privée du Canada has 53.85% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Assurance Maladie in 2025.

Incident History — Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada/Commissariat à la protection de la vie privée du Canada (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada/Commissariat à la protection de la vie privée du Canada cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Assurance Maladie (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Assurance Maladie cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/office-of-the-privacy-commissioner-of-canada.jpeg
Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada/Commissariat à la protection de la vie privée du Canada
Incidents

Date Detected: 10/2025
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 5/2025
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 10/2022
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unpatched and decommissioned server
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/assurance-maladie.jpeg
Assurance Maladie
Incidents

Date Detected: 03/2022
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Email Compromise
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 03/2022
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Account Hacking
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Assurance Maladie company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada/Commissariat à la protection de la vie privée du Canada company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada/Commissariat à la protection de la vie privée du Canada company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to Assurance Maladie company.

In the current year, Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada/Commissariat à la protection de la vie privée du Canada company has reported more cyber incidents than Assurance Maladie company.

Neither Assurance Maladie company nor Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada/Commissariat à la protection de la vie privée du Canada company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Both Assurance Maladie company and Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada/Commissariat à la protection de la vie privée du Canada company have disclosed experiencing at least one data breach.

Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada/Commissariat à la protection de la vie privée du Canada company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Assurance Maladie company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada/Commissariat à la protection de la vie privée du Canada company nor Assurance Maladie company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada/Commissariat à la protection de la vie privée du Canada nor Assurance Maladie holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Assurance Maladie company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada/Commissariat à la protection de la vie privée du Canada company.

Assurance Maladie company employs more people globally than Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada/Commissariat à la protection de la vie privée du Canada company, reflecting its scale as a Government Administration.

Neither Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada/Commissariat à la protection de la vie privée du Canada nor Assurance Maladie holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada/Commissariat à la protection de la vie privée du Canada nor Assurance Maladie holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada/Commissariat à la protection de la vie privée du Canada nor Assurance Maladie holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada/Commissariat à la protection de la vie privée du Canada nor Assurance Maladie holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada/Commissariat à la protection de la vie privée du Canada nor Assurance Maladie holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada/Commissariat à la protection de la vie privée du Canada nor Assurance Maladie holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H