Comparison Overview

Office of the Industry Advocate

VS

CDAC R&d

Office of the Industry Advocate

30 Wakefield St, Adelaide, 5000, AU
Last Update: 2025-12-12

CREATE OPPORTUNITES BUILD AWARENESS FOSTER COLLABORATION The Office of the Industry Advocate's role is to: Promote competitive, capable local businesses to government purchasers and private sector companies delivering contracts on behalf of the government. Recommend reforms to procurement and contracting practices to ensure local businesses are not disadvantages, Ensure local businesses have a full, fair and reasonable opportunity to win work on major projects under the South Australian Industry Participation Policy.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 11
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

CDAC R&d

IN, 560079
Last Update: 2025-12-14
Between 750 and 799

Centre for Development of Advanced Computing (C-DAC) is the premier R&D organization ofthe Department of Information Technology (DIT), Ministry of Communications & Information Technology (MCIT) for carrying out R&D in IT, Electronics and associated areas. Different areas of C-DAC, had originated at different times, many of which came out as a result of identification of opportunities.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 165
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/office-of-the-industry-advocate.jpeg
Office of the Industry Advocate
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
CDAC R&d
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Office of the Industry Advocate
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
CDAC R&d
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Relations Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Office of the Industry Advocate in 2025.

Incidents vs Government Relations Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for CDAC R&d in 2025.

Incident History — Office of the Industry Advocate (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Office of the Industry Advocate cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — CDAC R&d (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CDAC R&d cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/office-of-the-industry-advocate.jpeg
Office of the Industry Advocate
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
CDAC R&d
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

CDAC R&d company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Office of the Industry Advocate company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, CDAC R&d company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Office of the Industry Advocate company.

In the current year, CDAC R&d company and Office of the Industry Advocate company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither CDAC R&d company nor Office of the Industry Advocate company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither CDAC R&d company nor Office of the Industry Advocate company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither CDAC R&d company nor Office of the Industry Advocate company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Office of the Industry Advocate company nor CDAC R&d company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Office of the Industry Advocate nor CDAC R&d holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Office of the Industry Advocate company nor CDAC R&d company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

CDAC R&d company employs more people globally than Office of the Industry Advocate company, reflecting its scale as a Government Relations.

Neither Office of the Industry Advocate nor CDAC R&d holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Office of the Industry Advocate nor CDAC R&d holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Office of the Industry Advocate nor CDAC R&d holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Office of the Industry Advocate nor CDAC R&d holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Office of the Industry Advocate nor CDAC R&d holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Office of the Industry Advocate nor CDAC R&d holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N