Comparison Overview

Oceanside Museum of Art

VS

Springfield Museums

Oceanside Museum of Art

704 Pier View Way, Oceanside, 92054, US
Last Update: 2025-12-03
Between 750 and 799

Proudly located in the heart of the Oceanside, California Cultural District, Oceanside Museum of Art (OMA) is dedicated to bringing people together to explore the art and stories of Southern California artists since 1997. Through inspiring exhibitions, award-winning education programs, and dynamic events, activities, and offerings, OMA visitors of all ages, interests, and backgrounds experience a welcoming, friendly, and inclusive hub for creativity, connection, and learning through art. A little edgy, willing to take risks, and unpretentious, OMA is a reflection of the identity of the coastal community of Oceanside along the cultural corridor between Los Angeles and San Diego. OMA showcases the best visual arts talent in the region and celebrates the inspiring and transformative power of art. For more information, visit www.oma-online.org.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 45
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Springfield Museums

21 Edwards Street, Springfield, MA, US, 01103
Last Update: 2025-12-01

Located in the heart of downtown Springfield, Massachusetts, Springfield Museums, home of the Amazing World of Dr. Seuss, is comprised of five world-class museums and a sculpture garden: Five plus One equals FUN. Please visit the Michele & Donald D'Amour Museum of Fine Arts, the George Walter Vincent Smith Art Museum, the Springfield Science Museum, the Lyman & Merrie Wood Museum of Springfield History, the Amazing World of Dr. Seuss Museum and the Dr. Seuss National Memorial Sculpture Garden. One admission gives access to all attractions plus changing exhibits, facilitated hands on/minds on activity centers, and programing for all ages.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 94
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/oceanside-museum-of-art.jpeg
Oceanside Museum of Art
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/springfield-museums.jpeg
Springfield Museums
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Oceanside Museum of Art
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Springfield Museums
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Oceanside Museum of Art in 2025.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Springfield Museums in 2025.

Incident History — Oceanside Museum of Art (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Oceanside Museum of Art cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Springfield Museums (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Springfield Museums cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/oceanside-museum-of-art.jpeg
Oceanside Museum of Art
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/springfield-museums.jpeg
Springfield Museums
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Oceanside Museum of Art company and Springfield Museums company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Springfield Museums company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Oceanside Museum of Art company.

In the current year, Springfield Museums company and Oceanside Museum of Art company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Springfield Museums company nor Oceanside Museum of Art company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Springfield Museums company nor Oceanside Museum of Art company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Springfield Museums company nor Oceanside Museum of Art company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Oceanside Museum of Art company nor Springfield Museums company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Oceanside Museum of Art nor Springfield Museums holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Oceanside Museum of Art company nor Springfield Museums company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Springfield Museums company employs more people globally than Oceanside Museum of Art company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Oceanside Museum of Art nor Springfield Museums holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Oceanside Museum of Art nor Springfield Museums holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Oceanside Museum of Art nor Springfield Museums holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Oceanside Museum of Art nor Springfield Museums holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Oceanside Museum of Art nor Springfield Museums holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Oceanside Museum of Art nor Springfield Museums holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models (LLMs). Prior to 0.11.1, vllm has a critical remote code execution vector in a config class named Nemotron_Nano_VL_Config. When vllm loads a model config that contains an auto_map entry, the config class resolves that mapping with get_class_from_dynamic_module(...) and immediately instantiates the returned class. This fetches and executes Python from the remote repository referenced in the auto_map string. Crucially, this happens even when the caller explicitly sets trust_remote_code=False in vllm.transformers_utils.config.get_config. In practice, an attacker can publish a benign-looking frontend repo whose config.json points via auto_map to a separate malicious backend repo; loading the frontend will silently run the backend’s code on the victim host. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.11.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

fastify-reply-from is a Fastify plugin to forward the current HTTP request to another server. Prior to 12.5.0, by crafting a malicious URL, an attacker could access routes that are not allowed, even though the reply.from is defined for specific routes in @fastify/reply-from. This vulnerability is fixed in 12.5.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17, A Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability has been identified in the Angular Template Compiler. It occurs because the compiler's internal security schema is incomplete, allowing attackers to bypass Angular's built-in security sanitization. Specifically, the schema fails to classify certain URL-holding attributes (e.g., those that could contain javascript: URLs) as requiring strict URL security, enabling the injection of malicious scripts. This vulnerability is fixed in 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Gin-vue-admin is a backstage management system based on vue and gin. In 2.8.6 and earlier, attackers can delete any file on the server at will, causing damage or unavailability of server resources. Attackers can control the 'FileMd5' parameter to delete any file and folder.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Portkey.ai Gateway is a blazing fast AI Gateway with integrated guardrails. Prior to 1.14.0, the gateway determined the destination baseURL by prioritizing the value in the x-portkey-custom-host request header. The proxy route then appends the client-specified path to perform an external fetch. This can be maliciously used by users for SSRF attacks. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.14.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X