Comparison Overview

Oak View Group

VS

Live Nation Entertainment

Oak View Group

5050 S Syracuse St., None, Greenwood Village, CO, US, 80237
Last Update: 2025-12-04
Between 700 and 749

We are here to be a POSITIVE DISRUPTION to business as usual in the sports and live entertainment, and hospitality industries.

NAICS: 71
NAICS Definition: Arts, Entertainment, and Recreation
Employees: 4,166
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Live Nation Entertainment

9348 Civic Center Dr, Beverly Hills, 90210, US
Last Update: 2025-12-01

Recognized three years in a row by Great Place to Work® and named one of People Magazine’s Top 50 Companies that Care, Live Nation Entertainment is the global leader in live events and ticketing. With business operations and corporate functions across major divisions including Ticketmaster, Concerts, Media & Sponsorship and Artist Nation, we offer exciting opportunities across every discipline. Generous vacation, healthcare, and retirement benefits are just some of the perks we offer our full-time, global workforce. For any stage in your career, our benefits are designed to help you live life to the fullest. We offer student loan repayment, 6 months paid caregiver leave, Roadie Babies (bring your little ones & a caretaker on your work trips), Music@Home (cultivate your little ones music interest), and tuition reimbursement for ongoing career development. Plus, you'll have access to free concerts, festivals, and more through our exclusive employee ticket concierge.

NAICS: 71
NAICS Definition: Arts, Entertainment, and Recreation
Employees: 23,586
Subsidiaries: 26
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
5
Attack type number
2

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/oak-view-group.jpeg
Oak View Group
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/live-nation.jpeg
Live Nation Entertainment
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Oak View Group
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Live Nation Entertainment
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Entertainment Providers Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Oak View Group in 2025.

Incidents vs Entertainment Providers Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Live Nation Entertainment in 2025.

Incident History — Oak View Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Oak View Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Live Nation Entertainment (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Live Nation Entertainment cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/oak-view-group.jpeg
Oak View Group
Incidents

Date Detected: 11/2023
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/live-nation.jpeg
Live Nation Entertainment
Incidents

Date Detected: 6/2025
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: SQL injection vulnerabilities, Insider access mechanisms, Zero-day vulnerabilities
Motivation: Financial gain through selling data on dark web marketplaces
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 7/2024
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Exploitation of vulnerabilities in cloud storage services
Motivation: Financial Gain
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 7/2024
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unauthorized Access to Snowflake Account
Motivation: Financial Gain
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Live Nation Entertainment company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Oak View Group company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Live Nation Entertainment company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to Oak View Group company.

In the current year, Live Nation Entertainment company has reported more cyber incidents than Oak View Group company.

Neither Live Nation Entertainment company nor Oak View Group company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Both Live Nation Entertainment company and Oak View Group company have disclosed experiencing at least one data breach.

Live Nation Entertainment company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Oak View Group company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Oak View Group company nor Live Nation Entertainment company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Oak View Group nor Live Nation Entertainment holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Live Nation Entertainment company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Oak View Group company.

Live Nation Entertainment company employs more people globally than Oak View Group company, reflecting its scale as a Entertainment Providers.

Neither Oak View Group nor Live Nation Entertainment holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Oak View Group nor Live Nation Entertainment holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Oak View Group nor Live Nation Entertainment holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Oak View Group nor Live Nation Entertainment holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Oak View Group nor Live Nation Entertainment holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Oak View Group nor Live Nation Entertainment holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Sigstore Timestamp Authority is a service for issuing RFC 3161 timestamps. Prior to 2.0.3, Function api.ParseJSONRequest currently splits (via a call to strings.Split) an optionally-provided OID (which is untrusted data) on periods. Similarly, function api.getContentType splits the Content-Type header (which is also untrusted data) on an application string. As a result, in the face of a malicious request with either an excessively long OID in the payload containing many period characters or a malformed Content-Type header, a call to api.ParseJSONRequest or api.getContentType incurs allocations of O(n) bytes (where n stands for the length of the function's argument). This vulnerability is fixed in 2.0.3.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Monkeytype is a minimalistic and customizable typing test. In 25.49.0 and earlier, there is improper handling of user input which allows an attacker to execute malicious javascript on anyone viewing a malicious quote submission. quote.text and quote.source are user input, and they're inserted straight into the DOM. If they contain HTML tags, they will be rendered (after some escaping using quotes and textarea tags).

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

SysReptor is a fully customizable pentest reporting platform. Prior to 2025.102, there is a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability allows authenticated users to execute malicious JavaScript in the context of other logged-in users by uploading malicious JavaScript files in the web UI. This vulnerability is fixed in 2025.102.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Taiko Alethia is an Ethereum-equivalent, permissionless, based rollup designed to scale Ethereum without compromising its fundamental properties. In 2.3.1 and earlier, TaikoInbox._verifyBatches (packages/protocol/contracts/layer1/based/TaikoInbox.sol:627-678) advanced the local tid to whatever transition matched the current blockHash before knowing whether that batch would actually be verified. When the loop later broke (e.g., cooldown window not yet passed or transition invalidated), the function still wrote that newer tid into batches[lastVerifiedBatchId].verifiedTransitionId after decrementing batchId. Result: the last verified batch could end up pointing at a transition index from the next batch (often zeroed), corrupting the verified chain pointer.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A flaw has been found in youlaitech youlai-mall 1.0.0/2.0.0. Affected is the function getById/updateAddress/deleteAddress of the file /mall-ums/app-api/v1/addresses/. Executing manipulation can lead to improper control of dynamically-identified variables. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit has been published and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X