Comparison Overview

O'Connor | O'Connor, P.C.

VS

StudioIP

O'Connor | O'Connor, P.C.

110 E Schiller St, Elmhurst, IL, 60126, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28

The law firm of O’Connor | O’Connor is practiced in all manner of workplace issues. We are knowledgeable and up-to-date in all aspects of employment law, and have had much success representing both employer and employee alike. We are keenly aware of the ever changing paradigms in today’s modern culture and their impact in the workplace. At O’Connor | O’Connor we honor tradition while placing a higher value on smart, crisp, contemporary, practices.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 19
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

StudioIP

3000 Lawrence St, None, Denver, Colorado, US, 80205
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 700 and 749

StudioIP is a law firm + creative agency. We’re here to change the way premium brands are built and protected. Working collaboratively as creative lawyers and educated creatives for the benefit of our clients. We take chances. We win. We are nimble, strategic, efficient, informed and consultative. StudioIP creates, secures, protects, promotes and enforces all aspects of intellectual property ultimately to increase the value of the company & minimize its risks through compliance internationally. We engage in worldwide trademark prosecution & enforcement including litigation, copyright prosecution, protection & litigation, patent drafting, prosecution & strategy, licensing, data privacy & contracting, IP monetization strategy, business agreements, negotiation, take down enforcement, brand creation, graphic design, SEO, website design, market strategy, international IP strategy, and copy writing.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 10
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/o-connor-o-connor-p-c.jpeg
O'Connor | O'Connor, P.C.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/studioip.jpeg
StudioIP
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
O'Connor | O'Connor, P.C.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
StudioIP
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for O'Connor | O'Connor, P.C. in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for StudioIP in 2025.

Incident History — O'Connor | O'Connor, P.C. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

O'Connor | O'Connor, P.C. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — StudioIP (X = Date, Y = Severity)

StudioIP cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/o-connor-o-connor-p-c.jpeg
O'Connor | O'Connor, P.C.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/studioip.jpeg
StudioIP
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

O'Connor | O'Connor, P.C. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to StudioIP company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, StudioIP company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to O'Connor | O'Connor, P.C. company.

In the current year, StudioIP company and O'Connor | O'Connor, P.C. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither StudioIP company nor O'Connor | O'Connor, P.C. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither StudioIP company nor O'Connor | O'Connor, P.C. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither StudioIP company nor O'Connor | O'Connor, P.C. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither O'Connor | O'Connor, P.C. company nor StudioIP company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither O'Connor | O'Connor, P.C. nor StudioIP holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither O'Connor | O'Connor, P.C. company nor StudioIP company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

O'Connor | O'Connor, P.C. company employs more people globally than StudioIP company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither O'Connor | O'Connor, P.C. nor StudioIP holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither O'Connor | O'Connor, P.C. nor StudioIP holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither O'Connor | O'Connor, P.C. nor StudioIP holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither O'Connor | O'Connor, P.C. nor StudioIP holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither O'Connor | O'Connor, P.C. nor StudioIP holds HIPAA certification.

Neither O'Connor | O'Connor, P.C. nor StudioIP holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X