Comparison Overview

O'Brien House

VS

European Psychiatric Association

O'Brien House

446 N 12th St, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, 70802, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799

O’Brien House offers a comprehensive range of treatment programs focusing on three areas: Residential Treatment, Outpatient Treatment, Adult Education and Prevention Programs. THE PROGRAM Spirituality and dependence on a Higher Power Caring for each person Acceptance of the individual Respect of each individual Open Mindedness to others Confidentiality to staff and clients Honesty and sober living Unconditional love OUR SUPPORT AND BELIEF We provide support services for clients as they transition from in-patient treatment to independent living. We believe that intermediate care services increase the effectiveness of treatment for substance abuse programs, and that the percentages of individuals remaining in recovery is increased by living in a structured and protected environment during the first six months of recovery.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 56
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

European Psychiatric Association

15 avenue de la Liberté , Strasbourg, 67000, FR
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799

With active individual members in as many as +100 countries and 47 National Psychiatric Association Members who represent more than 80,000 European psychiatrists, the European Psychiatric Association is the largest association representing psychiatry in Europe. The EPA’s activities address the interests of psychiatrists in academia, research and practice throughout all stages of career development. The EPA deals with psychiatry and its related disciplines and it focuses on the improvement of care for the mentally ill as well as on the development of professional excellence.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 52
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/o-brien-house.jpeg
O'Brien House
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/european-psychiatric-association.jpeg
European Psychiatric Association
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
O'Brien House
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
European Psychiatric Association
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for O'Brien House in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for European Psychiatric Association in 2026.

Incident History — O'Brien House (X = Date, Y = Severity)

O'Brien House cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — European Psychiatric Association (X = Date, Y = Severity)

European Psychiatric Association cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/o-brien-house.jpeg
O'Brien House
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/european-psychiatric-association.jpeg
European Psychiatric Association
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

O'Brien House company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to European Psychiatric Association company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, European Psychiatric Association company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to O'Brien House company.

In the current year, European Psychiatric Association company and O'Brien House company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither European Psychiatric Association company nor O'Brien House company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither European Psychiatric Association company nor O'Brien House company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither European Psychiatric Association company nor O'Brien House company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither O'Brien House company nor European Psychiatric Association company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither O'Brien House nor European Psychiatric Association holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

O'Brien House company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to European Psychiatric Association company.

O'Brien House company employs more people globally than European Psychiatric Association company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither O'Brien House nor European Psychiatric Association holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither O'Brien House nor European Psychiatric Association holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither O'Brien House nor European Psychiatric Association holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither O'Brien House nor European Psychiatric Association holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither O'Brien House nor European Psychiatric Association holds HIPAA certification.

Neither O'Brien House nor European Psychiatric Association holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N