Comparison Overview

NYC Health + Hospitals

VS

Medical University of South Carolina

NYC Health + Hospitals

50 Water St., None, New York, NY, US, 10004
Last Update: 2025-12-09

NYC Health + Hospitals is the nation’s largest public health care delivery system. We are an integrated network of hospitals, trauma centers, neighborhood health centers, nursing homes, and post-acute care centers. We are a home care agency and a health plan, MetroPlus. The health system provides essential services to more than 1.4 million New Yorkers every year in more than 70 patient care locations and in their homes. Our talented workforce of more than 40,000 represents the diversity of our city and the communities we serve. The excellence of our staff, and our continued mission to care for all without exception, make us unique and rightly positioned to provide equitable, high-quality, culturally responsive, and affordable health care in every New York City community. Our promise to New Yorkers: Empower every New Yorker – without exception – to live the healthiest life possible by providing equitable, high quality, culturally responsive, and affordable health care in every community.

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 15,139
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Medical University of South Carolina

45 Courtenay Drive,, Charleston, sc, 29425, US
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799

The Medical University of South Carolina (MUSC) is a public institution of higher learning the purpose of which is to preserve and optimize human life in South Carolina and beyond. The university provides an interprofessional environment for learning and discovery through education of health care professionals and biomedical scientists, research in the health sciences and provision of comprehensive health care.

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 14,577
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/nyc-health-and-hospitals-corporation.jpeg
NYC Health + Hospitals
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/medical-university-of-south-carolina.jpeg
Medical University of South Carolina
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
NYC Health + Hospitals
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Medical University of South Carolina
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for NYC Health + Hospitals in 2025.

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Medical University of South Carolina in 2025.

Incident History — NYC Health + Hospitals (X = Date, Y = Severity)

NYC Health + Hospitals cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Medical University of South Carolina (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Medical University of South Carolina cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/nyc-health-and-hospitals-corporation.jpeg
NYC Health + Hospitals
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/medical-university-of-south-carolina.jpeg
Medical University of South Carolina
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

NYC Health + Hospitals company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Medical University of South Carolina company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Medical University of South Carolina company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to NYC Health + Hospitals company.

In the current year, Medical University of South Carolina company and NYC Health + Hospitals company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Medical University of South Carolina company nor NYC Health + Hospitals company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Medical University of South Carolina company nor NYC Health + Hospitals company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Medical University of South Carolina company nor NYC Health + Hospitals company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither NYC Health + Hospitals company nor Medical University of South Carolina company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither NYC Health + Hospitals nor Medical University of South Carolina holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither NYC Health + Hospitals company nor Medical University of South Carolina company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

NYC Health + Hospitals company employs more people globally than Medical University of South Carolina company, reflecting its scale as a Hospitals and Health Care.

Neither NYC Health + Hospitals nor Medical University of South Carolina holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither NYC Health + Hospitals nor Medical University of South Carolina holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither NYC Health + Hospitals nor Medical University of South Carolina holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither NYC Health + Hospitals nor Medical University of South Carolina holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither NYC Health + Hospitals nor Medical University of South Carolina holds HIPAA certification.

Neither NYC Health + Hospitals nor Medical University of South Carolina holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

LibreChat is a ChatGPT clone with additional features. In versions 0.8.0 and below, there is no handler for JSON parsing errors; SyntaxError from express.json() includes user input in the error message, which gets reflected in responses. User input (including HTML/JavaScript) can be exposed in error responses, creating an XSS risk if Content-Type isn't strictly enforced. This issue does not have a fix at the time of publication.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

LibreChat is a ChatGPT clone with additional features. In versions 0.8.0 and below, when creating prompts, JSON requests are sent to define and modify the prompts via PATCH endpoint for prompt groups (/api/prompts/groups/:groupId). However, the request bodies are not sufficiently validated for proper input, enabling users to modify prompts in a way that was not intended as part of the front end system. The patchPromptGroup function passes req.body directly to updatePromptGroup() without filtering sensitive fields. This issue is fixed in version 0.8.1.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

LibreChat is a ChatGPT clone with additional features. In versions 0.8.0 and below, when a user posts a question, the iconURL parameter of the POST request can be modified by an attacker. The malicious code is then stored in the chat which can then be shared to other users. When sharing chats with a potentially malicious “tracker”, resources loaded can lead to loss of privacy for users who view the chat link that is sent to them. This issue is fixed in version 0.8.1.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

MaxKB is an open-source AI assistant for enterprise. Versions 2.3.1 and below have improper file permissions which allow attackers to overwrite the built-in dynamic linker and other critical files, potentially resulting in privilege escalation. This issue is fixed in version 2.4.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

MaxKB is an open-source AI assistant for enterprise. In versions 2.3.1 and below, the tool module allows an attacker to escape the sandbox environment and escalate privileges under certain concurrent conditions. This issue is fixed in version 2.4.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H