Comparison Overview

NVR, Inc.

VS

VINCI

NVR, Inc.

11700 Plaza America Dr, Reston, Virginia, 20190, US
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

NVR, Inc. is a Top 5 US Homebuilder and an industry leading company. With 75 years of experience building quality homes and successful careers, and our standing as the most profitable publicly traded homebuilding company in the US, NVR has developed our reputation for stability & responsibility. As a market leading homebuilder, NVR operates throughout 35 metropolitan areas in 15 states under the brand names of Ryan Homes, NVHomes, and Heartland Homes. We are the dominant homebuilder in each of our markets and have constructed more than 535,000 homes while maintaining a commitment to quality product & customer care. NVR Mortgage’s primary focus is to serve the needs of NVR homebuyers while NVR Settlement Services provides a complete range of settlement and title services to support NVR’s homebuilding operations. At the corporate level, NVR provides various support functions and an intertwined network of resources utilized by each of its companies, including essential managerial structures, sales & marketing support, vital human resource specialists, and an advanced information technology department. Learn more about NVR by visiting www.nvrinc.com.

NAICS: 23
NAICS Definition: Construction
Employees: 5,248
Subsidiaries: 3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

VINCI

Last Update: 2025-11-22
Between 800 and 849

VINCI is a world leader in concessions, energy and construction, employing 280.000 people in some 120 countries. We design, finance, build and operate infrastructure and facilities that help improve daily life and mobility for all. Because we believe in all-round performance, above and beyond economic results, we are committed to operating in an environmentally and socially responsible manner. You can be part of projects that bring lasting change to urban ecosystems and entire regions. Join the team!

NAICS: 23
NAICS Definition: Construction
Employees: 13,465
Subsidiaries: 134
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/nvr-inc-.jpeg
NVR, Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/vinci.jpeg
VINCI
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
NVR, Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
VINCI
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Construction Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for NVR, Inc. in 2025.

Incidents vs Construction Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for VINCI in 2025.

Incident History — NVR, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

NVR, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — VINCI (X = Date, Y = Severity)

VINCI cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/nvr-inc-.jpeg
NVR, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/vinci.jpeg
VINCI
Incidents

Date Detected: 9/2023
Type:Ransomware
Attack Vector: phishing, exploiting vulnerabilities, supply chain compromises, third-party breaches, cookie hijacking
Motivation: financial gain, operational disruption, geopolitical influence, strategic hybrid warfare
Blog: Blog

FAQ

VINCI company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to NVR, Inc. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

VINCI company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas NVR, Inc. company has not reported any.

In the current year, VINCI company and NVR, Inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

VINCI company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while NVR, Inc. company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither VINCI company nor NVR, Inc. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither VINCI company nor NVR, Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither NVR, Inc. company nor VINCI company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither NVR, Inc. nor VINCI holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

VINCI company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to NVR, Inc. company.

VINCI company employs more people globally than NVR, Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Construction.

Neither NVR, Inc. nor VINCI holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither NVR, Inc. nor VINCI holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither NVR, Inc. nor VINCI holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither NVR, Inc. nor VINCI holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither NVR, Inc. nor VINCI holds HIPAA certification.

Neither NVR, Inc. nor VINCI holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H