Comparison Overview

NVIDIA

VS

ASUS

NVIDIA

2701 San Tomas Expressway, None, Santa Clara, CA, US, 95050
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 800 and 849

Since its founding in 1993, NVIDIA (NASDAQ: NVDA) has been a pioneer in accelerated computing. The company’s invention of the GPU in 1999 sparked the growth of the PC gaming market, redefined computer graphics, ignited the era of modern AI and is fueling the creation of the metaverse. NVIDIA is now a full-stack computing company with data-center-scale offerings that are reshaping industry.

NAICS: 3341
NAICS Definition: Computer and Peripheral Equipment Manufacturing
Employees: 41,594
Subsidiaries: 19
12-month incidents
2
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
3

ASUS

No.15, Lide Road, Beitou District, Taipei City, Taipei, TW, 112
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 650 and 699

ASUS is a global technology leader delivering incredible experiences that enhance the lives of people everywhere. World renowned for continuously reimagining today’s technologies for tomorrow, ASUS puts users first In Search of Incredible to provide the world’s most innovative and intuitive devices, components, and solutions. Today’s ASUS is more ambitious than ever, unleashing remarkable gaming, content-creation, AIoT, and cloud solutions that solve user needs and infuse delight. ASUS is home to industry-leading experts who are encouraged to pursue their passion for innovation and entrepreneurial spirit to deliver the future of technology to the world. With a team of 5,000 in-house R&D colleagues, ASUS received more than 11 awards every day in 2020 and is ranked as one of Fortune’s World’s Most Admired Companies. Working together as One Team, ASUS team members strive to transform and evolve, trust in radical truth and transparency, and embrace idea meritocracy and foster collective wisdom in the limitless pursuit of the incredible. And because tomorrow's experiences start with today’s actions, the people of ASUS are setting new industry standards and delivering on a strong commitment to environmental and community stewardship every day. At ASUS, every individual can find the opportunity to push the limits of what is yet to be imagined, and to make it real. To learn more about our aspirations and what we offer, visit asus.com/about-asus/

NAICS: 3341
NAICS Definition: Computer and Peripheral Equipment Manufacturing
Employees: 16,061
Subsidiaries: 4
12-month incidents
3
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
4

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/nvidia.jpeg
NVIDIA
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/asus.jpeg
ASUS
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
NVIDIA
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
ASUS
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Computer Hardware Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

NVIDIA has 212.5% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents vs Computer Hardware Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

ASUS has 368.75% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incident History — NVIDIA (X = Date, Y = Severity)

NVIDIA cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — ASUS (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ASUS cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/nvidia.jpeg
NVIDIA
Incidents

Date Detected: 7/2025
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Rowhammer, Bluetooth Exploits, Phishing, Data Theft
Motivation: Financial Gain, Data Theft
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 6/2025
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Remote Code Execution (RCE) via shared memory manipulation
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 6/2024
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Software Vulnerability, DoS Attack
Motivation: Data Theft, Disruption of Operations
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/asus.jpeg
ASUS
Incidents

Date Detected: 12/2025
Type:Ransomware
Motivation: Extortion
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 6/2025
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Local
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 5/2025
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Remote Code Execution
Blog: Blog

FAQ

NVIDIA company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to ASUS company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

ASUS company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to NVIDIA company.

In the current year, ASUS company has reported more cyber incidents than NVIDIA company.

ASUS company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while NVIDIA company has not reported such incidents publicly.

NVIDIA company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other ASUS company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Both ASUS company and NVIDIA company have reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks.

Both NVIDIA company and ASUS company have disclosed vulnerabilities.

Neither NVIDIA nor ASUS holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

NVIDIA company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to ASUS company.

NVIDIA company employs more people globally than ASUS company, reflecting its scale as a Computer Hardware Manufacturing.

Neither NVIDIA nor ASUS holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither NVIDIA nor ASUS holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither NVIDIA nor ASUS holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither NVIDIA nor ASUS holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither NVIDIA nor ASUS holds HIPAA certification.

Neither NVIDIA nor ASUS holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N